Should Miguel Cotto be given his 0 back?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Undefeated
    MasterMind
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2005
    • 9366
    • 392
    • 281
    • 17,529

    #51
    No, but its not about the 0.. Its the damage that was done.

    Comment

    • Bosompincher
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Sep 2007
      • 100
      • 0
      • 0
      • 6,179

      #52
      Originally posted by MR.CHICANITO
      no i dont think he should be given his '' 0 '' back..lol its cotto's chin that gave out and plus miguel cotto aint unbeatable even demarcus corley came close to knocking him out ..either way its gonna happen again in the margarito rematch..miguel cotto is a great fighter but his chin aint that great..its suspect
      Cos his chin gave out he was most likely getting hit with plaster(not proven but highly suspect).

      Dream on Cotto will win rematch!

      BP

      Comment

      • Miburo
        Double X
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 9112
        • 515
        • 356
        • 18,175

        #53
        No. Did they rule Pryor-Arguello a NC? No, because there wasn't any concrete evidence.

        Comment

        • Chase8400
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2007
          • 2861
          • 95
          • 63
          • 3,022

          #54
          Good poll topic, credit to the poster.

          The answer is NO.

          The reason is because there is no way to prove NOW that he used the same material in the fight with Cotto and their camp will never admitt to it to the public in a million years. Margarito's career is OVER with now, basically.

          I for one think that he DID use the material but without sufficient evidence, he IS innocent until proven otherwise.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP