Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nigel Benn: "Calzaghe Beats Me, Hagler, Hearns, Sugar"

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by NeXt In Line View Post
    PSHHHH, the only person I think he could beat on that list wold be Sugar Ray Leonard, being that he was not as good at the higher weights. Calzaghe in NO WAY beats Hagler or Hearns.

    Check my track record, I am not a Calzaghe hater, but he doesnt beat HAgler or Hearns, I could give him Benn, Duran and Leonard MAYBE, but no way he beats Hearns or Hagler.
    WOW

    You are incredibly delusional. Calzaghe would have no trouble at all with those 2.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
      I think it's actually very possible that Calzaghe could hustle his way to decision Hagler. Hagler did lose to a past his prime Leonard who fought only once in five years and never fought at middleweight. Calzaghe is bigger, fast enough and hits harder than Leonard at middleweight. Hagler had a lot of problems with an old Duran and Duran's best weight was 135-147. Hagler won a very close 15 round decision on Duran. It may have gone the other way if the fight was 12 rounds.
      Hagler fought terribly that night against Ray. Also, you have to consider that Joe would not have fought Hagler in the way that Ray did, he would most likely have come at him and tried to pressure him. Marvin would have eaten that up IMO. Hagler's Duran fight is a strange one. It is almost like he totally went in there with the wrong game plan or something. I think Marvin beats Joe. He would have had the workrate to stick with him and I just think he would have ended up overwhelming him and getting a semi-comfortable decision.

      Comment


      • #33
        And Hagler was past his prime as well when he fought Leonard....

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
          I think it's actually very possible that Calzaghe could hustle his way to decision Hagler. Hagler did lose to a past his prime Leonard who fought only once in five years and never fought at middleweight. Calzaghe is bigger, fast enough and hits harder than Leonard at middleweight. Hagler had a lot of problems with an old Duran and Duran's best weight was 135-147. Hagler won a very close 15 round decision on Duran. It may have gone the other way if the fight was 12 rounds.
          It depends on which Calzaghe you are talking about. If you are talking about Calzaghe that fought Kessler, no, he does not hit harder than Leonard, he is a slapster. Marvin would have zero respect for those shots and walk him down.

          Comment


          • #35
            I got Hearns winning. I think he's the major styles clash there. Hagler is no guaranteed win despite the Leonard trickery. I have a hard time believing a man who tasted canvas so easy by past it greats (who look like they'd be nightmares for Joe in their prime themselves) should be even looked past before bestowing wins on Cal against 80's greats.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Zocalo View Post
              Fighting a 43 year old Hopkins and a 39 year old Jones is one same level as fighting a Marvin Hagler.

              God people are obtuse...
              i respect benns opinion a billion times more than yours he was in the ring fighting wars theres only one ring your ever gonna be in and its not a boxing ring i dont care what anyone says hopkins now is just as good as he has been over the years and plenty of ppl say the same thing you opinions your own but to me i think benn will know a bit more than anyone on here

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by cush3 View Post
                What in thee blue hell is Nigel Benn smoking because I want some.If Calzaghe was around when Hagler,Hearns,and Leonard was in their early 30's I would bet all my savings and my house on them.Calzaghe would get knocked out by all of them
                then im afraid to say it could be very likely u would be living in a box broke lol

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Haglerwins View Post
                  I got Hearns winning. I think he's the major styles clash there. Hagler is no guaranteed win despite the Leonard trickery. I have a hard time believing a man who tasted canvas so easy by past it greats (who look like they'd be nightmares for Joe in their prime themselves) should be even looked past before bestowing wins on Cal against 80's greats.
                  lol he got dropped twice yeah but look what he did once he got back up and bhops still crying about it hahahaha

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Danny nolan View Post
                    lol he got dropped twice yeah but look what he did once he got back up and bhops still crying about it hahahaha
                    What's the common ground in both cases though? Neither fighter had the young legs to keep up. Give Jones his speed back and give me even a 2007 version of Hopkins and he gets the decision.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Benn needs to stop smoking crack... Im am a fan of Joe, but honestly, Joe beat Lacy who is no a bum, Kessler who is not an A class fighter, Hopkins who many beleieved won the fight and is 44, and Jones who should have retired years ago, and now people think he could beat a prime SRL, Hernes, Duran, and Hagaler? GET REAL!!!!!!
                      Again stop smoking crack Benn...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP