Only one question for Calzaghe fans
Collapse
-
im no calzaghe fan but everyone considered lacy to be the next big thing even all the pros thought he mas an elite and wud beat joe hands down and if they considered lacy to be elite then how can u say otherwise he was massive fave to win and got hammered all the calzaghe haters out there are always gonna say he was a hype job but he beat ppl considered superstars
Because he's not elite. End of story.Comment
-
Comment
-
Ok this is a ****** post/poll because you say it's for Calzaghe FANS, but obviously those that are going to vote will be Calzaghe haters, and they'll all vote NO.
The whole definition of what makes someone "elite" is so subjective it's not even worth discussing. Ricky Hatton has been in the top 10 P4P for years and anyone who tries to tell me he's more skilled than Kessler should ****in' die.
Lacy might not have been "elite", but everyone picked him to KO Calzaghe, and not because they thought Calzaghe ******, but because everyone was on Lacy's nuts so hard. So that win, especially when you consider what Joe did to him, definitely qualifies as a victory over a prime, elite fighter.
Also, the whole "prime" thing is ******. Some fighters are so good, that even outside of their prime they still do stuff that no one expects them to do. We recently saw this with Mosley beating Margarito. While Hopkins was not in his "prime", he was still ranked top 5 P4P, so why all the talk about "prime AND elite", it's really pointless. Some fighters don't have to be in their prime to be elite, and others may be viewed as elite by some people, but not by ALL people. The point I'm trying to make is that it's very easy to try to discredit someone's resume by picking it apart like this, and it can be done with every fighter.Comment
-
Sorry dude, Hops wasn't close to his prime. Watch him in 1999, 2000...2001...that was his prime...and that was a long time ago.Comment
-
Would you rank Kessler above Hatton?Ok this is a ****** post/poll because you say it's for Calzaghe FANS, but obviously those that are going to vote will be Calzaghe haters, and they'll all vote NO.
The whole definition of what makes someone "elite" is so subjective it's not even worth discussing. Ricky Hatton has been in the top 10 P4P for years and anyone who tries to tell me he's more skilled than Kessler should ****in' die.
Lacy might not have been "elite", but everyone picked him to KO Calzaghe, and not because they thought Calzaghe ******, but because everyone was on Lacy's nuts so hard. So that win, especially when you consider what Joe did to him, definitely qualifies as a victory over a prime, elite fighter.
Also, the whole "prime" thing is ******. Some fighters are so good, that even outside of their prime they still do stuff that no one expects them to do. We recently saw this with Mosley beating Margarito. While Hopkins was not in his "prime", he was still ranked top 5 P4P, so why all the talk about "prime AND elite", it's really pointless. Some fighters don't have to be in their prime to be elite, and others may be viewed as elite by some people, but not by ALL people. The point I'm trying to make is that it's very easy to try to discredit someone's resume by picking it apart like this, and it can be done with every fighter.Comment
-
i never said he was i said plenty of ppl in the boxing world considered him elite and you can say what you like had it been the other way round there would be ppl in here ranting that lacy is elite fact is he got smashed the **** out of elite or notComment
-
I think Kessler was far and away hist best win. Whether he's considered elite is up for debate...I, personally would lean towards no.Comment
Comment