Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Log in
Or
Sign Up
Forgot password or user name?
Log in with
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Home
Forum
Boxing Forums
Non Stop Boxing
The 'Non Stop Boxing' forum is visible to all users. To see additional forums please
register
or login.
which title is the most prestigious (not division)
Collapse
Sign in or register here to comment
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Sign In / Register
Page
of
5
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
1
2
3
4
5
template
Next
street bully
Tua's daddy.
Join Date:
Jan 2008
Posts:
25014
Received
697
Given
263
Points:
35,118
Share
Tweet
#11
02-04-2009, 08:18 PM
Originally posted by
Fairweather
I think in order it's:
The Ring belt
WBC
WBA
IBF
WBO
Actually the IBF is more prestigious than the WBA.
Comment
Post
Cancel
PR Boxer
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Feb 2008
Posts:
1154
Received
69
Given
47
Points:
7,309
Share
Tweet
#12
02-04-2009, 08:20 PM
The Ring title is the most prestigious followed by in my opinion the WBA since it is the oldest of the major organizations.
Comment
Post
Cancel
713832281
Houston Texas
Join Date:
Apr 2008
Posts:
1308
Received
87
Given
217
Points:
7,712
Share
Tweet
#13
02-05-2009, 12:21 AM
The Ring. No other belt is worth anything.
Comment
Post
Cancel
larryx
Banned
Join Date:
May 2008
Posts:
13892
Received
225
Given
108
Points:
15,442
Share
Tweet
#14
02-05-2009, 12:24 AM
ring belt or **** you
Comment
Post
Cancel
larryx
Banned
Join Date:
May 2008
Posts:
13892
Received
225
Given
108
Points:
15,442
Share
Tweet
#15
02-05-2009, 12:25 AM
Originally posted by
street bully
Actually the IBF is more prestigious than the WBA.
hell to the no it isnt..ibf just started being recongnized
Comment
Post
Cancel
larryx
Banned
Join Date:
May 2008
Posts:
13892
Received
225
Given
108
Points:
15,442
Share
Tweet
#16
02-05-2009, 12:35 AM
ring belt
wbc
wba
the rest are fringe
Comment
Post
Cancel
Enayze
Boss
Join Date:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4976
Received
354
Given
211
Points:
13,479
Share
Tweet
#17
02-05-2009, 12:39 AM
Belts dont matter, the fighter makes the belts not the other way around.
Can anyone argue Wladimir Klitschko's position even if he just had the WBO?
Comment
Post
Cancel
Ch@mpBox@PR
Banned
Join Date:
Feb 2008
Posts:
21432
Received
432
Given
279
Points:
22,261
Share
Tweet
#18
02-05-2009, 12:39 AM
I feel they all are equally garbage. The WBC is no better form the WBO ,WBA or IBF. They all are as dumb and crooked as each other.
I think the ring gets more credibility, because you only loose the belt in the ring, and 8 out of 10 times, the right guy is the champ!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment
Post
Cancel
THe TRiNiTY
Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
Join Date:
Dec 2006
Posts:
10079
Received
405
Given
103
Points:
17,986
Share
Tweet
#19
02-05-2009, 12:41 AM
I go by The Ring title. If there is no champion, I settle for the WBC title. That's it.
Comment
Post
Cancel
ggurtin
Contender
Join Date:
Sep 2008
Posts:
242
Received
11
Given
0
Points:
6,349
Share
Tweet
#20
02-05-2009, 12:45 AM
I did a long write-up on this, if someone would like me to bump it I will
WBO is actually #1 if anyone looks at the ratings and champs
WBC is #2
IBF is a close #3
IBO is #4 cuz at least ratings are decent
WBA is pitiful
Comment
Post
Cancel
Sign in or register here to comment
Previous
1
2
3
4
5
template
Next
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
😀
😂
🥰
😘
🤢
😎
😞
😡
👍
👎
☕
TOP
Sign In
USERNAME
PASSWORD
Forgot password?
Remember Me
SIGN IN
Register
Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
JOIN NOW
Comment