which title is the most prestigious (not division)

**hishaam15** · 02-04-2009, 06:30 PM

Originally posted by Danny nolan

i just wondered which boxing title people reguard as the most prestigious ???

WBC/IBF/WBA>WBO>IBO/WBF> evry other minor belt

**Harold Lederman** · 02-04-2009, 06:30 PM

The Ring should be noticed the most.

WBO I don't think it should be a major title, as WBC,WBA and IBF were before, another "major" belt organzation is crap.

**Harold Lederman** · 02-04-2009, 06:31 PM

Originally posted by hishaam15

WBC/IBF/WBA>WBO>IBO/WBF> evry other minor belt

Basically, agreed.

**rizkybizness** · 02-04-2009, 06:38 PM

Pint4Pint rankings

**Chups** · 02-04-2009, 07:08 PM

RING/lineal title>WBC>WBA>IBF

Making more alphabet belts should stop NOW!! WBO should not be even considered a major belt. For now I'm contented with those 4 titles.

**GERONIMO** · 02-04-2009, 07:11 PM

they all suck butt.wbc started the abc bull****.

**Fairweather** · 02-04-2009, 07:16 PM

I think in order it's:

The Ring belt
WBC
WBA
IBF
WBO

**MANGLER** · 02-04-2009, 07:41 PM

The Ring belt is basically the real world title nowadays.

**The Texican** · 02-04-2009, 08:15 PM

The Ring Champion is the one that matters becuase it can only be lost in the ring.

which title is the most prestigious (not division)