Ricky Hatton's Lawyer Threatens To Sue Manny Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BrooklynBomber
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2004
    • 28365
    • 1,563
    • 1,544
    • 44,979

    #11
    Binding verbal contracts? Only in Great Britain.

    Comment

    • antworst
      Amateur
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 12
      • 0
      • 0
      • 6,035

      #12
      A verbal contract can be just as binding as a written one.

      Comment

      • DIOS DOMINICANO
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2007
        • 11119
        • 493
        • 206
        • 12,010

        #13
        Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
        According to Ricky Hatton's legal counsel, Gareth Williams, they have a binding verbal contract to fight Manny Pacquiao on May 2 with an agreed upon 50-50 split. Two days ago, Pacquiao's lawyer, Franklin Gacal, told reporters that Manny will not accept an equal split of the money. He said Pacquiao is looking for a 60-40 split. Hatton refuses to fight Pacquiao for anything less than a 50-50 split. [details]
        "Ricky brings as much to the table as Manny".

        That is BS. Manny Pacquiao has sold decently-to-solidly on PPV. Ricky Hatton has never sold a PPV. The only PPV fight Hatton has ever appreared on was with Mayweather. All of Hatton's other fights were on WCB. In fact, just within the past year, Hatton was fighting on Versus. Hatton sells a live gate. Not PPV.


        Manny deserves the bigger share. Hatton should win this fight...but Manny deserves the bigger share.

        Comment

        • BetterCallSaul
          Shot!
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 9026
          • 598
          • 681
          • 16,488

          #14
          Originally posted by DIOS DOMINICANO
          "Ricky brings as much to the table as Manny".

          That is BS. Manny Pacquiao has sold decently-to-solidly on PPV. Ricky Hatton has never sold a PPV. The only PPV fight Hatton has ever appreared on was with Mayweather. All of Hatton's other fights were on WCB. In fact, just within the past year, Hatton was fighting on Versus. Hatton sells a live gate. Not PPV.


          Manny deserves the bigger share. Hatton should win this fight...but Manny deserves the bigger share.
          You are dumb. Hatton has sold millions in UK PPV. Now get back to school.

          Comment

          • DIOS DOMINICANO
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2007
            • 11119
            • 493
            • 206
            • 12,010

            #15
            Originally posted by antworst
            A verbal contract can be just as binding as a written one.
            Seldom.

            You need objective witnesses (or an admission of truth) for a binding verbal. Do you think Arum will say "Yeah, I agreed to pay 50/50"? Would Arum ever admit that?

            Comment

            • Enemy/Friend
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 1728
              • 50
              • 17
              • 1,955

              #16
              Originally posted by DIOS DOMINICANO
              "Ricky brings as much to the table as Manny".

              That is BS. Manny Pacquiao has sold decently-to-solidly on PPV. Ricky Hatton has never sold a PPV. The only PPV fight Hatton has ever appreared on was with Mayweather. All of Hatton's other fights were on WCB. In fact, just within the past year, Hatton was fighting on Versus. Hatton sells a live gate. Not PPV.


              Manny deserves the bigger share. Hatton should win this fight...but Manny deserves the bigger share.
              Hatton has been on many PPV cards in Britain.......

              Comment

              • EL ANIMAL
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 1058
                • 16
                • 0
                • 7,150

                #17
                55-45 manny!! Whats the problem??

                Comment

                • DIOS DOMINICANO
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2007
                  • 11119
                  • 493
                  • 206
                  • 12,010

                  #18
                  Originally posted by timba1988
                  You are dumb. Hatton has sold millions in UK PPV. Now get back to school.
                  Thsi is a US domestic fight with HBO Boxing broadcast rights. The fight is in Vegas. Not Wembley.

                  It's funny when people who don't understand the business try to comment and throw insults.

                  Comment

                  • DIOS DOMINICANO
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 11119
                    • 493
                    • 206
                    • 12,010

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Enemy/Friend
                    Hatton has been on many PPV cards in Britain.......
                    Where is the fight being held?

                    Comment

                    • BrooklynBomber
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2004
                      • 28365
                      • 1,563
                      • 1,544
                      • 44,979

                      #20
                      Originally posted by antworst
                      A verbal contract can be just as binding as a written one.
                      Not according to statute of frauds.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP