The Haters in General, have a real **** up Logic..that they even know works against them
According to the boards:
1. Floyd never fought any good welterweight.
2. Floyd wasnt a impressive welterweight champion because he didnt look impressive At the weight and was boring and didnt fight nobody.
3. Ricky Hatton is a great win at 140 and a terrible win at 147.
4. Ricky Hatton wasn't a real Welterweight Champion because he didnt look impressive when he won his title.
So Commonsense would lead you to believe listening to some of these people on here, that Floyd's Run at Welterweight just like Ricky Hatton's wasnt impressive....Because they never fought anybody....
SAY THIS IS TRUE..!!!!
If Floyd wasnt a impressive welterweight champion because he never fought any good welterweights....
What does a Floyd win at welterweight mean for a fighter like (Margarito,Cotto,Mosely,Berto,Clottey) if he wasnt impressive at welterweight???
What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?
Does it mean you beat a mediocre Welterweight?
Does it mean you beat a fighter who didnt belong at Welterweight because most of his career was at 135 and under?
Does it mean you beat a fighter who never was impreesive at Welterweight anyways?
Then Why would someone fight floyd at welterweight if he was a mediocre Welterweight according to some of you guys...??
Why not Fight a career welterweight like Margarito, Cotto, Williams, Clottey, etc.
According to the logic.
a win over Williams should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
a win over Cotto should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
a win over Margarito should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
a win over Mosely should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
a win over Clottey should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
Because they are all career welterweights and resumes more impressive then
Floyds at Welterweight.
Why not fight Floyd at 135? <<< he was the man in this division
Why not fight Floyd at 130? <<< he was the man in this division
Why not fight Floyd at 140? <<< he was ducked in this division
Why fight Floyd at welterweight if he was no good there???
Margarito walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
Cotto walks around at 160+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
Clottey walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
Williams walks around at 170+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
Hatton walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Jr. Welterweight
Floyd walks around at 150, and so you cant say he cant fight at Jr.Lightweight, Lightweight, and Junior Welterweight.....
If Margarito, Cotto, Williams, Clottey, and Hatton can walk around at 20-40 pounds above there fighting weight and still fight at their divisions...I think Floyd can do the same....
According to the logic on NSB, My Question is What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?
The Haters in General, have a real **** up Logic..that they even know works against them
According to the boards: 1. Floyd never fought any good welterweight. 2. Floyd wasnt a impressive welterweight champion because he didnt look impressive At the weight and was boring and didnt fight nobody. 3. Ricky Hatton is a great win at 140 and a terrible win at 147. 4. Ricky Hatton wasn't a real Welterweight Champion because he didnt look impressive when he won his title.
So Commonsense would lead you to believe listening to some of these people on here, that Floyd's Run at Welterweight just like Ricky Hatton's wasnt impressive....Because they never fought anybody....
SAY THIS IS TRUE..!!!!
If Floyd wasnt a impressive welterweight champion because he never fought any good welterweights....
What does a Floyd win at welterweight mean for a fighter like (Margarito,Cotto,Mosely,Berto,Clottey) if he wasnt impressive at welterweight???
What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?
Does it mean you beat a mediocre Welterweight?
Does it mean you beat a fighter who didnt belong at Welterweight because most of his career was at 135 and under?
Does it mean you beat a fighter who never was impreesive at Welterweight anyways?
Then Why would someone fight floyd at welterweight if he was a mediocre Welterweight according to some of you guys...??
Why not Fight a career welterweight like Margarito, Cotto, Williams, Clottey, etc.
According to the logic.
a win over Williams should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
a win over Cotto should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
a win over Margarito should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
a win over Mosely should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
a win over Clottey should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
Because they are all career welterweights and resumes more impressive then Floyds at Welterweight.
Why not fight Floyd at 135? <<< he was the man in this division
Why not fight Floyd at 130? <<< he was the man in this division
Why not fight Floyd at 140? <<< he was ducked in this division
Why fight Floyd at welterweight if he was no good there???
Margarito walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
Cotto walks around at 160+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
Clottey walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
Williams walks around at 170+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
Hatton walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Jr. Welterweight
Floyd walks around at 150, and so you cant say he cant fight at Jr.Lightweight, Lightweight, and Junior Welterweight.....
If Margarito, Cotto, Williams, Clottey, and Hatton can walk around at 20-40 pounds above there fighting weight and still fight at their divisions...I think Floyd can do the same....
According to the logic on NSB, My Question is What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?
what the **** is all this ****, i aint reading this horse ****
Horus you are obsessed with Mayweather, seriously, this is like the 1000th thread arguing the same point. "Mayweather doesn't get enough respect" or "people are using the double standard against Mayweather." Get used to it, if people don't like a fighter, they will say whatever to discredit them. Mayweather isn't the only one.
horus is gay, he ****** floyds **** for dinner, then he licked floyds ******* to the point where he tasted some peanuts , horus is a fruitcake,
thats why him and malcolm always agree, you know, you have to be a genious to agree with malcolm
Tweet
Comment