A Win over Margarito,Cotto,Mosely, & Clottey are Better Than A MAYWEATHER WIN @ WW???

[Horus]

he was asking honest question and floyd like horus.. just evade them !

he rathers preffers to pitty pat him self in the back ! philtyRichat hooooooooooollllaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

Lol Horus evading questions....

Dude this is a boxing forum why would i evade questions?

What do i got too lose?

[mellow_mood]

Lol Horus evading questions....

Dude this is a boxing forum why would i evade questions?

What do i got too lose?

I am not changing the topic...But expanding on the topic.
If you had to give Floyd a grade...what would it be?

............

[Horus]

SEE YA SUPER BOWL WEEKEND..!!!

[Horus]

The Haters in General, have a real **** up Logic..that they even know works against them

According to the boards:
1. Floyd never fought any good welterweight.
2. Floyd wasnt a impressive welterweight champion because he didnt look impressive At the weight and was boring and didnt fight nobody.
3. Ricky Hatton is a great win at 140 and a terrible win at 147.
4. Ricky Hatton wasn't a real Welterweight Champion because he didnt look impressive when he won his title.

• So Commonsense would lead you to believe listening to some of these people on here, that Floyd's Run at Welterweight just like Ricky Hatton's wasnt impressive....Because they never fought anybody....

SAY THIS IS TRUE..!!!!

If Floyd wasnt a impressive welterweight champion because he never fought any good welterweights....

What does a Floyd win at welterweight mean for a fighter like (Margarito,Cotto,Mosely,Berto,Clottey) if he wasnt impressive at welterweight???


What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?

• Does it mean you beat a mediocre Welterweight?
• Does it mean you beat a fighter who didnt belong at Welterweight because most of his career was at 135 and under?
• Does it mean you beat a fighter who never was impreesive at Welterweight anyways?

Then Why would someone fight floyd at welterweight if he was a mediocre Welterweight according to some of you guys...??

• Why not Fight a career welterweight like Margarito, Cotto, Williams, Clottey, etc.

According to the logic.

• a win over Williams should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Cotto should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Margarito should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Mosely should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Clottey should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.

Because they are all career welterweights and resumes more impressive then
Floyds at Welterweight.

• Why not fight Floyd at 135? <<< he was the man in this division
• Why not fight Floyd at 130? <<< he was the man in this division
• Why not fight Floyd at 140? <<< he was ducked in this division

Why fight Floyd at welterweight if he was no good there???

• Margarito walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
• Cotto walks around at 160+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
• Clottey walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
• Williams walks around at 170+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
• Hatton walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Jr. Welterweight

Floyd walks around at 150, and so you cant say he cant fight at Jr.Lightweight, Lightweight, and Junior Welterweight.....

If Margarito, Cotto, Williams, Clottey, and Hatton can walk around at 20-40 pounds above there fighting weight and still fight at their divisions...I think Floyd can do the same....

According to the logic on NSB, My Question is What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?

Now that the Mosley vs. Margarito fight is here.. and soon it is over I am pretty sure that The boards will be full of Mayweather hate overrating the other fighters win tonight. And I am pretty Sure that People will say Mayweather would get his ass kicked by both margarito and mosely...
Because thats how NSB works... After every big fight... At the end of that fight people can not let Mayweather stay out of the discussion..Instead they ruin their fighters accomplishment by trying to compare what they just did to floyd... Not knowing while in the process Rising floyd prestige more and more each time they compare a great accomplishment to Floyd. And the repeated damn logic argument is always Such and such is the man, and Floyd never beat a top ww...!!

So once again
What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?

Since we know everybody will be calling on Floyd to fight their favorite fighter...

[Horus]

So does a margarito win still mean more then a floyd win @ ww?

[mellow_mood]

So does a margarito win still mean more then a floyd win @ ww?

lmao @ your sorry ass trying to make floyd look better because shane mosley beat the **** of margo!>..


until ur boy step it up in the ring with any of the top dogs!!! his name isnt allowed in the same sentence of the top dogs @ welter

sorry man... floyds name .. .doesnt have to do anything with BOXING HAVING A GREAT FIGHT LAST NIGHT!

[GreatestIam]

Im a Mayweather fan, but with Pac-man dominating ODLh like he did, and Mosely fighting both Cotto and Margarito going 1-1 and a lingereing Paul Wiliiams lying in wait... The **** Mayweather has done at WW doesnt seem that impressive, Okay he stepped up to the challenge in the Baldimoir fight but, com-on who is Baldi- He beat Judah, lets say it now Judah aint elite, an old ODLH and Ricky Hatton the only true worthy opponent, but IMO Floyd has a lot to prove with Pac-man dominating Oscar how he did and potententally Hatton 2... There are defientely more fights I THINK MAYWETHEAR MUST FIGHT and not just the winner of Pac-man Hatton, but Cotto or Mosely, maybe williams but 1 worthy and 2 other bums doesnt cut it.. this guy neeeds to step up1

[UnDeniable]

Beating Floyd would mean more than beating any other WW, if someone beat Floyd history would judge that person as the guy who beat an undefeated, 5 weight champ who was the most talented and talked about fighter of his era

so to answer your question, a victory over Floyd by say for example Mosley would be a better win than if he beat a Clottey or a Cotto etc

[Horus]

lmao @ your sorry ass trying to make floyd look better because shane mosley beat the **** of margo!>..


until ur boy step it up in the ring with any of the top dogs!!! his name isnt allowed in the same sentence of the top dogs @ welter

sorry man... floyds name .. .doesnt have to do anything with BOXING HAVING A GREAT FIGHT LAST NIGHT!

How would you grade Mayweather run at Welterweight?
A+ = Greatest ever.
A = 2nd Greatest ever
A-= Greatest of His era
B+= Great (ring champion) and he was undisputed
B= He Did what he had to do to be recognize champ of the ww ( ring belt)
B-= He was the man, but he could have done more.
C+= He beat the man, and that's it.
C= Average
C-= Good
D+= Paper Champ
D= Below Average
D-=Worst than Paper Champ
F= Worst Champion he could possibly be.

[mellow_mood]

How would you grade Mayweather run at Welterweight?
A+ = Greatest ever.
A = 2nd Greatest ever
A-= Greatest of His era
B+= Great (ring champion) and he was undisputed
B= He Did what he had to do to be recognize champ of the ww ( ring belt)
B-= He was the man, but he could have done more.
C+= He beat the man, and that's it.
C= Average
C-= Good
D+= Paper Champ
D= Below Average
D-=Worst than Paper Champ
F= Worst Champion he could possibly be.

@ welter

ricky hatton
carlos baldomir
zab judah
shramba mitchell

****
when you have fighters like paul williams, miguel cotto, shane mosley, antonio margarito, joshua clottey facing each other

according to your grades. i will go for a C +.