Who took more risks? Hatton or Calzaghe?

**Nacho_Analstain** · 01-08-2009, 03:14 PM

Ricky Hatton.

**FeFist** · 01-08-2009, 03:15 PM

Hatton easily. Joe took on fighters out of their prime, way past.

**krispy kreme** · 01-08-2009, 03:15 PM

Yeah I would say Hatton, he fought Floyd in his prime.

**S.G.** · 01-08-2009, 03:16 PM

Calzaghe for sure...

Ricky's "risks" all heralded greater rewards than risks, and were all measured and cleverly marketed/chosen

**deevel79** · 01-08-2009, 03:16 PM

Hatton. He fought pfp#1 Floyd, and is now facing the pfp#1 Pac.

**Nacho_Analstain** · 01-08-2009, 03:18 PM

Originally posted by S.G.

Calzaghe for sure...

Ricky's "risks" all heralded greater rewards than risks, and were all measured and cleverly marketed/chosen

Hahahaha!!!

**S.G.** · 01-08-2009, 03:18 PM

Originally posted by deevel79

Hatton. He fought pfp#1 Floyd, and is now facing the pfp#1 Pac.

his career was built up towards taking these huge paydays where he has virtually 0 chance of winning

hatton's career is just a load of smoke and mirrors

**Kris Silver** · 01-08-2009, 03:18 PM

Hatton. But it is rather convenient two top p4p guys were around and willing to fight him with the big bucks he brings. Calzaghe went to a new weight, in the very first time at it faced a legend and top p4p guy with impressive recent wins in his country, his judges 4 years later than he originally wanted. So it's not by as massive a degree some may think given the circumstances and potential bouts.

**Chunk..** · 01-08-2009, 03:23 PM

Originally posted by S.G.

his career was built up towards taking these huge paydays where he has virtually 0 chance of winning

hatton's career is just a load of smoke and mirrors

Hatton has huge paydays fighting bums.

Who took more risks? Hatton or Calzaghe?