Performance of the Year 2008: Vitali's Return
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I only care about my opinion. Peter was, and always will be complete garbage. And the reason why people don't give Vitali credit is obvious. Who has he beaten?? No-one mate. He has not proved his class cos he has NEVER beaten a top class opponent.Comment
-
he was the second best heavyweight in the world and alot of people picked him to knock Vitali out and then knock Wlad out in a rematch
its hard for people to give a great white fighter any creditComment
-
Whoever he beats, you'll then say that fighter is bum, no matter how highly regarded he was beforehand!
You know, the same as they do to Joe Calzaghe.Comment
-
Pavlik>>>>Sam Peter
Pavlik was highly regarded, the best fighter in his division, young, impressive and just an outstanding fighter. Can you say the same about peter? Keep in mind, Pavlik is white, since you whine all day about whites getting no respect, what argument do you have?Comment
-
Vitali should receive all the credit for stopping Peter though this proves that the division is **** when the old champ comes back after 4 years to own the young lion that seemed to many as the savior of the divisionComment
-
Comment
-
Hopkins gave a great performance - no doubt about it.Pavlik>>>>Sam Peter
Pavlik was highly regarded, the best fighter in his division, young, impressive and just an outstanding fighter. Can you say the same about peter? Keep in mind, Pavlik is white, since you whine all day about whites getting no respect, what argument do you have?
I made a thread about it the night of the fight:
Why can't people give Vitali credit like that? Because they don't have the class or good sportsmanship to do it?Comment
Comment