Whos the #1 Lightweight

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • El Dominicano
    Banned
    • Aug 2007
    • 10074
    • 226
    • 49
    • 10,758

    #41
    Originally posted by Flawless.
    How does Pacman have more votes over Campbell
    Reason why I don't take any votes polls involving Pac seriously. Alot of pac fans are idiots

    Comment

    • badboypeenoy
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 3203
      • 54
      • 44
      • 9,669

      #42
      on paper:

      Marquez - he's the lineal champ
      Campbell - he's got all but one belt
      Pacman - he's got the other belt
      Diaz - comes last because he was in the poll with the other three

      skill:

      Pacman - he's number 1 P4P
      Marquez - he's number 2 P4P (at least in my opinion)
      Campbell - he beat Diaz but would probably lose against Marquez or Pac
      Diaz - comes last because he was in the poll with the other three

      Comment

      • warp1432
        the mailman
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 14406
        • 478
        • 347
        • 24,060

        #43
        Originally posted by Flawless.
        How does Pacman have more votes over Campbell
        Probably because Marquez is the lineal champ, but Pacquiao holds a victory and a draw over Marquez (even though I think Marquez won both of those fights). Also due to the fact he's p4p number 1 would be my guess.

        Of course, I don't agree with that reasoning at all, but since you asked.

        Comment

        • pistol whip
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 8645
          • 255
          • 4
          • 15,040

          #44
          Originally posted by multivitamins
          I got Pacquiao and Campbell. Casamayor was clearly robbed against Sta. Cruz. I didn't give JMM credit when someone already beat Casa's ass.
          This post made my head hurt from the ******ity!!!

          Seriously why do people wanna crown Champions on what if's and should of been's?

          JMM beat the linear Lightweight champion of the World so that makes him the champ. How can this be argued? How do you beat the champ and then wanna give someone else the belt? Does this guys work for the WBC or somthing??
          Last edited by pistol whip; 12-22-2008, 01:41 AM.

          Comment

          • pistol whip
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2008
            • 8645
            • 255
            • 4
            • 15,040

            #45
            Originally posted by MakeDamnSure
            Sta. Cruz should be the champion then.
            Jesus ****ing Christ more What If's!!!

            If Champions were crowned in this fashion Max Schmelling should of been crowned HW Champion after Joe Louis beat Jimmy Braddock for the Title.

            Right??

            Comment

            • Flawless.
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 3534
              • 114
              • 60
              • 4,248

              #46
              Originally posted by warp1432
              Probably because Marquez is the lineal champ, but Pacquiao holds a victory and a draw over Marquez (even though I think Marquez won both of those fights). Also due to the fact he's p4p number 1 would be my guess.

              Of course, I don't agree with that reasoning at all, but since you asked.
              Pacman has win over JMM at 130 not 135. If Mayweather fought at 140 he would not be best at 140 but Hatton would

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP