Who gave pacquiao a more convincing defeat? Marquez or Morales?

[stickandmove12]

Pacman is great, but he got out worked by morales in the first fight, just watched it today. The second and third pacman for sure, but as they said it was hard for morales to make weight, maybe he was drained.

[Addition]

Marquez didn't win either fight you fool.

[goblin]

Barrera did go on to win his next 6 fights after the first Pacquiao fight though. It may have not been convincing wins over Marquez but the fact is he has a draw(scorecard error) and a win is all that matters.

well u are correct, its just a fact that barrera wasnt in his hey day when he did fight manny..i really dont think he was. manny's resume has been simply a joke IMO since the first barrera fight..although the ONE win i do give manny credit for the most is when he fought barrera the first time[yes pacfans the same barrera who was NOT done with his trilogy against erik]

[goblin]

Marquez didn't win either fight you fool.

read my first couple paragraphs and shut the **** up, chico....

[MakeDamnSure]

Morales won a 2 point decision with a big cut on Pac's face. Pacquiao even dominated Morales many rounds also in the first fight. The rematch happened in a span within a year Pacquiao beat Marquez twice.

[Alibata]

another hater in fantasy land.... Hahahahahah...
Get with the real world ese.... Deal with the facts. You like your responses. Not too many people in dreamland I take it... It must be very lonely with all the whining going on there... Tell hector and ferocity I said hi.

[Jose Rizal]

well u are correct, its just a fact that barrera wasnt in his hey day when he did fight manny..i really dont think he was. manny's resume has been simply a joke IMO since the first barrera fight..although the ONE win i do give manny credit for the most is when he fought barrera the first time[yes pacfans the same barrera who was NOT done with his trilogy against erik]

Barrera was the Ring Magazine Peoples People's Champ and widely regarded as at least top 3-5 pound-for-pound fighter back in 2003. He was the lineal featherweight champ and was the WBC champ before he trashed the belt. So I think Barrera was still in his heyday when he faced Pacquiao.

[goblin]

Morales won a 2 point decision with a big cut on Pac's face. Pacquiao even dominated Morales many rounds also in the first fight. The rematch happened in a span within a year Pacquiao beat Marquez twice.

Ummm..the sport is called BOXING not tennis man. [not saying u are] but certain manny's fannies using the "blood was in manny's eye" excuse is one the most downright hilarious excuses ive ever..ALMOST as funny as i didnt train properly and ofcourse the legendary:SOCKS!! SOCKS!! he had blisters cause of socks!!!..jeeez pacfans crack me up sometimes.

[Alibata]

Barrera was the Ring Magazine Peoples People's Champ and widely regarded as at least top 3-5 pound-for-pound fighter back in 2003. He was the lineal featherweight champ and was the WBC champ before he trashed the belt. So I think Barrera was still in his heyday when he faced Pacquiao.

He doesn't want us to respond... You can only respond if you live in fantasy world and think Marquez won... hahahahahaha... do you live in fantasy world, aka hater paradise?..People in the real world cannot post here.

[felice]

as i remember manny NEVER weight less then 140 since the 1st morales fight for a 130lb fight..if he's gonna do that the LEAST he can do is fight prime fighters for ****s sake..

is there a rule that, a fighter who's going to fight in 130lbs should not weight 140+ lbs on fight day?