Zag's ain't a *****. But Dawson would beat him...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Silencers
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 21957
    • 505
    • 235
    • 32,983

    #31
    Originally posted by Allucard
    Really? What makes you think he can win? Wouldn't the fight already been made if Joe could win? I mean, he never got a title at LHW and that was his chance. None ATG, except for the HWs for obvious reasons, were one division champions only. It's very hard to put Joe even in a special hall of fame without lowering the bar so much everyone above average would get in. A win over Dawson would change that allot, would make him look better than he ever has. The original poster has a point when he says Joe has never fought a prime proven opponent, something EVERY ATG did. It's kinda of a waste also if you have talent to waste it in NOT trying, which lead to two possible conclusions the way i see it. Either Joe's people are very ****** or he doesn't have the required talent. I don't think they're very ******.
    His speed, experience and awkwardness would win him the fight IMO, Calzaghe's camp has valid claims that Dawson doesn't bring enough money to the table, not that many people know who he is right now, maybe the rumored Tarver fight in March on HBO will change that because I think HBO will use that fight to push for Dawson-Calzaghe.

    And Calzaghe should already be in the HOF with all that he has accomplished, if you consider Hopkins an ATG because of his resume and accomplishments, then Calzaghe should be one too.

    Comment

    • S A M U R A I
      Bulletproof
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 181694
      • 1,495
      • 1,324
      • 1,419,318

      #32
      Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16
      Joe is picking his fights carefully at this point because he wants to retire unbeaten. People need to realize that there is a reason why Joe fought Jones instead of Dawson. People say Dawson is not accomplished, but do you really think Kessler's resume was better? Joe had no problem fighting him.
      Man oh man...

      Why am I bothering...

      Dawson is good. He's just not the killer you think.

      Talk is cheap. Tell Dawson to fight someone who isn't 40 and get back to me. Dawson needs to AT LEAST beat Johnson convincingly, maybe beat Hopkins too, before he deserves a shot at Calzaghe.



      100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

      Comment

      • slicksouthpaw16
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 6374
        • 259
        • 501
        • 16,743

        #33
        Originally posted by F•R•K•O
        Yeah right. You seem to forget Calzaghe has one of the best chins in boxing. Chad can throw all he wants at him, he ain't gonna do ****.
        Dawson punches harder than Hopkins does and is certainly faster and bigger. I would say Adamek has a better chin than Joe does and Dawson staggered him with a counter right hook off the ropes( which Joe would be vulnerable to against another southpaw). Don't let anyone fool you, he has power.

        Originally posted by F•R•K•O
        Man oh man...

        Why am I bothering...

        Dawson is good. He's just not the killer you think.

        Talk is cheap. Tell Dawson to fight someone who isn't 40 and get back to me. Dawson needs to AT LEAST beat Johnson convincingly, maybe beat Hopkins too, before he deserves a shot at Calzaghe.
        Hopkins, Jones............

        Comment

        • Porter's Dad
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 6831
          • 659
          • 84
          • 19,977

          #34
          Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16

          Hopkins, Jones............


          I know, man. I think initially they used it to counter the suggestions that Slappy fights old men.

          But now they genuinely use it to discredit Dawson

          Calslappy fans accusing another fighting of picking on old men

          Comment

          • slicksouthpaw16
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 6374
            • 259
            • 501
            • 16,743

            #35
            Originally posted by Keyser Soze


            I know, man. I think initially they used it to counter the suggestions that Slappy fights old men.

            But now they genuinely use it to discredit Dawson

            Calslappy fans accusing another fighting of picking on old men
            Not only that but they look even more silly for the simple fact that Dawson's last two opponents had already knocked out Roy, and Joe had to get off the floor to win a DECISION.

            Comment

            • AndyShitHot
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 2155
              • 71
              • 146
              • 9,074

              #36
              Yeah ATG Tomasz Adamek put Dawson on his arse but Dawson still won an easy decision so whats your point again?

              Comment

              • Clegg
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 24673
                • 3,726
                • 2,307
                • 233,274

                #37
                Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16
                Not only that but they look even more silly for the simple fact that Dawson's last two opponents had already knocked out Roy, and Joe had to get off the floor to win a DECISION.
                Yeah, and the fact that Hopkins had already beaten Dawson's last two opponents...let's not mention that.

                I like Calzaghe and Dawson. I would cheer for these guys against anyone at 175+

                It's a shame that if they do fight, it seems as if the forum will be split into 'Calzaghe is ****, Dawson will destroy him' vs 'Dawson is ****, Calzaghe will destroy him', rather than something a bit more sensible.

                Virtually every thread on here is just two or more nuthuggers who refuse to listen to valid criticism or logic arguing with one another.

                Comment

                • slicksouthpaw16
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 6374
                  • 259
                  • 501
                  • 16,743

                  #38
                  Originally posted by AndyShitHot
                  Yeah ATG Tomasz Adamek put Dawson on his arse but Dawson still won an easy decision so whats your point again?
                  Yeah but Calzaghe wasn't fighting Adamek, he fought Jones who had not won a big fight in years and going into that fight, everyone knew what would happen. My point was that Johnson and Tarver( Dawson's last two opponents) has already beaten Jones, and people criticize Dawson for fighting 40 year old even though they were still at the top of their divisions. I am just not a fan of double standards.

                  Comment

                  • slicksouthpaw16
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 6374
                    • 259
                    • 501
                    • 16,743

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Clegg
                    Yeah, and the fact that Hopkins had already beaten Dawson's last two opponents...let's not mention that.
                    Lets also not mention that Johnson was a young inexperienced fighter at the time Bernard beat him and Joe pulled out of a fight with Johnson two times and never even mentions Dawson, i don't we should mention that at all. Calzaghe is smarter than we all think, he knows that Dawson has a bad style for him. Don't be suprised if he looks at the winner of Froch and Taylor for a farewell fight instead.
                    Last edited by slicksouthpaw16; 12-14-2008, 12:50 AM.

                    Comment

                    • Clegg
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 24673
                      • 3,726
                      • 2,307
                      • 233,274

                      #40
                      Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16
                      Lets also not mention that Johnson was a young inexperienced fighter at the time Bernard beat him and Joe pulled out of a fight with Johnson two times and never even mentions Dawson, i don't we should mention that at all.
                      Let's also not mention that Tarver is past his best now, whereas when he fought Jones...

                      Do you see where this is going?

                      You seem to have missed my point. It's tiresome for me personally to come on here and see one side only look at the positives of Dawson and ignore the negatives, while the other side does the exact same thing for Calzaghe.

                      The aim of you and most others is to do your best to make the guy you support look as good as possible, while making the opponent/potential opponent look as bad as possible.

                      Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16
                      Calzaghe is smarter than we all think, he knows that Dawson has a bad style for him. Don't be suprised if he looks at the winner of Froch and Pascal for a farewell fight instead.
                      This is just fanboy talking/whining. Direct it at someone else.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP