Assessing Hopkins vs. Pavlik

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Ryan
    Guest
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2004
    • 23429
    • 1,301
    • 1,089
    • 29,664

    #11
    Originally posted by roundingace
    I agree and said the same thing while not taking a great fight away from Bernard. BUT - anyone who has watched Kelly, knows that wasn't him in there. Maybe it was just because it was Bernard, maybe the weight, maybe the sickness. I really don't know. That fight featured, IMO, Bernard Hopkins and someone who looked like Kelly Pavlik.
    Jeff Lacy didn't look like Jeff Lacy against Joe Calzaghe.

    Hector Camacho didn't look like Hector Camacho against Julio Cesar Chavez.

    Felix Trinidad didn't look like Felix Trinidad against Bernard Hopkins.

    A better fighter will do that to someone. Nothing in boxing is accidental but the result of your adversary's will. If a fighter doesn't perform like he does normally, it's because his opponent wouldn't let him.

    Comment

    • THE REED
      Sixty Forty
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2007
      • 43489
      • 1,992
      • 1,483
      • 690,068,075

      #12
      Originally posted by Asian Sensation
      Jeff Lacy didn't look like Jeff Lacy against Joe Calzaghe.

      Hector Camacho didn't look like Hector Camacho against Julio Cesar Chavez.

      Felix Trinidad didn't look like Felix Trinidad against Bernard Hopkins.

      A better fighter will do that to someone. Nothing in boxing is accidental but the result of your adversary's will. If a fighter doesn't perform like he does normally, it's because his opponent wouldn't let him.
      or because hes fighting at 2 weight classes above where hes ever fought before

      Comment

      • Nacho_Analstain
        Boxing in the face
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2006
        • 9517
        • 612
        • 815
        • 18,663

        #13
        He walks around much bigger than 160, the weight did nothing but help him, he had more time to concentrate on technique and strategy when not having to lose as much weight.

        Hopkins beat him with little to no advantages, Pavlik isn't a technical smart fighter ... hes a straight up come forward fighter who didn't know how to deal with the smartness of an old boxing wizard.

        Pavlik also said he felt better than ever in training camp ... he said his punches felt better than ever, he felt faster and more powerful than ever and he also said what i mentioned ... he had more time to work on strategy.

        The only thing that could have been to his disadvantage is if he underestimated Bernard ... I have a sneaky feeling he did.

        Comment

        • El Dominicano
          Banned
          • Aug 2007
          • 10074
          • 226
          • 49
          • 10,758

          #14
          Originally posted by reedickyaluss
          so u think it makes no difference in kellys fighting whether hes at 160 or 170?
          In all honesty, NO...don't think so. Pavlik couldn't land a 1-2 because B-Hop is smart enough to know when to clinch or he'd simply move to the side. Neither was Pavlik gonna beat B-Hop on the insde...Considering B-Hop knows all the tricks in the book and Pavlik doesn't even throw short hooks which didn't help. All in all, B-Hop has faced better punchers then Pavlik...I don't see how Pavlik could have possibly won...regardless of weight

          Comment

          • bsrizpac
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2004
            • 6837
            • 289
            • 21
            • 7,134

            #15
            Originally posted by reedickyaluss
            I just disagree.... That wasn't Pavlik in there... and it wasnt JUST because he was fighting Hopkins...
            Although F-R-K-O and other fans are hyping hopkins over pavlik to make Joe look better, I have to agree with them. Not because of Joe but simply because size didn't seem to play any factor at all in that fight and how it went about. (just like how Hopkins beat Tito with skill, not size).

            Other than the Ten pounds possibly slowing Hopkins down, I can't see how you can make any argument that Pavlik would do better at a lower weight.

            Bernard was pretty good at Middleweight if you recall.

            Comment

            • Lord13
              Banned
              • Jun 2008
              • 773
              • 58
              • 9
              • 871

              #16
              Pavlik was clearly drugged.

              Comment

              • Mr. Ryan
                Guest
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2004
                • 23429
                • 1,301
                • 1,089
                • 29,664

                #17
                Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                or because hes fighting at 2 weight classes above where hes ever fought before
                Damn.

                They should have told him that in the contract before he signed it, right?

                After everyone loses, they weren't the same for that fight or they didn't get up for the fight or they were sick or the size difference was too much.

                This guy was talking about how Joe Calzaghe was running from him, yet the size difference wouldn't be too much against Calzaghe? He'd be moving up to 170+ for that fight also.

                Everyone has a story.

                Comment

                • El Dominicano
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 10074
                  • 226
                  • 49
                  • 10,758

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Asian Sensation
                  Damn.

                  They should have told him that in the contract before he signed it, right?

                  After everyone loses, they weren't the same for that fight or they didn't get up for the fight or they were sick or the size difference was too much.

                  This guy was talking about how Joe Calzaghe was running from him, yet the size difference wouldn't be too much against Calzaghe? He'd be moving up to 170+ for that fight also.
                  Everyone has a story.
                  Good point. The hell! Why didn't I think of that.

                  Comment

                  • THE REED
                    Sixty Forty
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 43489
                    • 1,992
                    • 1,483
                    • 690,068,075

                    #19
                    thats fine... im honestly to exhausted to debate right now... my mind skills are taking time off today... ill just agree to disagree... although i know hopkins ha da lot to do with it, i think the weight definitely slowed him and his workrate down... but thats where ill leave it

                    Comment

                    • Ray  Ray
                      HOLDIN IT DOWN`
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 7791
                      • 451
                      • 852
                      • 20,693

                      #20
                      Reed..I gotta disagree with you on this one...I think its safe to say that Pavlik has problems with fighters that move...We've say that in the first Taylor\Pavlik fight...He was getting frustrated with Taylor (at least from my perspective) I thought Pavlik was going to win myself (due to Hopkins stamina issues in his past 2 or 3 fights) but I cant take this win away from Hopkins...You cant really say he didnt look like himself when Hopkins is known for making fighters fight an ugly fight...Pavlik didnt have to come at the 170 lb limit...He could have gotten down to a weight he was more comfortable at (160)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP