Better Resume: Calzaghe or Mayweather?
Collapse
-
-
JC has a better record. JC is beating people in his mid thirties. Could PBF still be succesful at that age?Comment
-
Mayweather, it's not even close. Calzaghe beat two fighters who already have a foot in the retirement home. Lacy is a nobody, and Kessler is still unproven. You can try and argue that Joe wanted the big fights but because he was in Wales, couldn't get them, but the fact is whether that's true or not, he doesn't have any recognizable names on his resume before Lacy. Mayweather has beaten more recognizable and credible names than Calzaghe has, and he's held more titles in more divisions than Joe has. In terms of resume? There's no contest here.
I personally think Joe is overrated and overhyped, but I admit he's got great skills. Still he's not better than Mayweather at anything. Except being white... and having a hot wife... and being from Europe...Last edited by Madvillain; 11-11-2008, 07:37 AM.Comment
-
I dont Pick castillo because for me, castillo woooped Floyds ass in the first fight, so I dont count that as a win for Floyd. and I think Bika was better than woodhall.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment