New Ring Ratings: Darchinyan not in top 10 P4P

[MELLY-MEL...]

You ignred my question mel, why was pavlik p4p after beating taylor.

ask the ring! he wasn't in my eyes.

[AntonTheMeh]

I dont think traingle theories work in picking p4p. But hey im not saying your wrong for not thinkning his p4p, i just happen to think he should due to the way it has been done recently. Thats all.

that was my point.but a loss drops you some.obviously.

[Eaner0919]

Like i said its veeerrry easy to crticise any fighter resume. Give me a name of someon who deserves to be on the p4p more then vic and watch me use you downplaying style to make it seem like they have beat nobody.

so I take it you wont answer my question yet pose another question as it suits your arguement?

hell I answered Googler's question, albeit probably not the answer he was "reaching" for but I did none the less

[MELLY-MEL...]

oopssssssssssssssssss disregard.

[ragingvic]

ask the ring! he wasn't in my eyes.

See thats all im saying bro, according to the rules used recently vic should be top 10 p4p. Its not fair to change the rules as it applies to vic, but not for pavlik or margarito. Im not on here to say that whoever says vic isnt p4p is dumb.

[Eaner0919]

See thats all im saying bro, according to the rules used recently vic should be top 10 p4p. Its not fair to change the rules as it applies to vic, but not for pavlik or margarito. Im not on here to say that whoever says vic isnt p4p is dumb.

what rules are you speaking of?

[MELLY-MEL...]

See thats all im saying bro, according to the rules used recently vic should be top 10 p4p. Its not fair to change the rules as it applies to vic, but not for pavlik or margarito. Im not on here to say that whoever says vic isnt p4p is dumb.

were talking about vic here. no one else. thats a different matter so stay on topic.

[ragingvic]

so I take it you wont answer my question yet pose another question as it suits your arguement?

hell I answered Googler's question, albeit probably not the answer he was "reaching" for but I did none the less

Like i told you before vic beat the people who wwere and conitnue to be considered the best in the class he was in, done. Your boxing "knowledge" as you say is based on finding the tiny details of a fighters history or a certain fight to take away credit for it. If Pachecho was so dominant, why did he get ktfo. I can do what you did with vics resume with the greates fighters available, floyd, roy jones, bhop, you name it excuses are easy victories are not.

[ragingvic]

were talking about vic here. no one else. thats a different matter so stay on topic.

See that where your wrong and biased, how can we talk about vic being top 10 p4p if we dont look at the criteira used for other fighters eithe being considered top 10 or not. why is the criteri diferent for vic?

[ragingvic]

what rules are you speaking of?

i guess i should have said examples/criteria, such as that of margairto or that of pavlik, or even PW, why is he p4p.