More Impressive? Foreman or Hopkins?

[WhoreUs]

Who was more impressive in their loss?

42 yr. old George Foreman against Evander Holyfield in 1991 or 43 yr. old Bernard Hopkins against Joe Calzaghe?

i'm not asking which fight was closer which everyone who votes hopkins seems to think. i'm asking whose performance was more impressive.

[WhoreUs]

foreman for me.

great showing by the old man.

[them_apples]

Foreman for me.

Great showing by the old man.

Holyfield took foreman to school after round 3, Calzaghe almost lost. So its Hopkins for me.

[Flawless 2]

This thread fails like Tito's career after Hopkins

[Silencers]

Hopkins for me, although Foreman's performance was really good as well.

[BLOODGOD]

Im voting for Hopkins...

[Flab]

I voted for the better fight.

[WhoreUs]

This thread fails like Tito's career after Hopkins

yeah he could have fought more in retirement.

foreman was impressive in his loss.

bernard looked like **** and took joe down with him.

[WhoreUs]

I voted for the better fight.

foreman-holyfied was a great fight.

calzaghe-hopkins was so boring.

[WhoreUs]

Holyfield took foreman to school after round 3, Calzaghe almost lost. So its Hopkins for me.

it was a clear loss for hopkins.

bernard just didn't do much.