Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

so who loss was worser?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Flawless 2 View Post
    Pavlik lost to a better fighter who is an ATG and a HOFer. Cotto lost to Margarito who isn't any of them. Pavlik was not stopped but got out hustled. Cotto was stopped and embarrassed like the coward and fraud he is. Pavlik did not quit while Cotto voluntary took 2 knees than quit like a coward. Cotto hype was a lot more than Pavlik Hype.

    Cotto loss was embarrassing not to him but to his country and his family.
    Tell us how you really feel.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by -Antonio- View Post
      Tell us how you really feel.
      da gay is an idiot.pay him no mind.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by RicDaRula View Post
        Doode....plz tell me you know the name of that broad on your sig!!!!
        Jessica aka Miss Rabbit

        yes thats her whole name

        Comment


        • #44
          Pavlik by far is going to have the tougher hill to climb back up as far as confidence goes.

          Cotto was very much in the fight against Margarito, but just got gassed and then hurt. He did a lot of good things in that fight he can build and improve upon.

          Pavlik has nothing in his fight with Hopkins to build upon. He could not seem to do anything right. This is why we are seeing so many excuses. The only thing that will bring Pavlik back now, is a couple easy wins. He will be very hesitant going into his next fight as he will be questioning himself. How he handles it, will most likely dictate the remainder of his career.

          Cotto fell apart late in his fight, but Pavlik was never in his.

          Comment


          • #45
            You could make a case for Cotto to get a rematch. Pavlik getting a rematch at Hopkins would be an instant joke. Simple as that.

            Comment


            • #46
              Whos lose was worser? Id say Cottos he started to get his ass beat By a jogging in Margarito, motha****a was bloodied all up.. Pavlik just got taught a lesson ****, Calzaghe's beating of Lacy was worst then Pavliks lose... However The Hopkins win was more exciting and historical, but Pavlik didnt real get busted up like the others, which make them worser in contrare

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by GreatestIAM View Post
                Whos lose was worser? Id say Cottos he started to get his ass beat By a jogging in Margarito, motha****a was bloodied all up.. Pavlik just got taught a lesson ****, Calzaghe's beating of Lacy was worst then Pavliks lose... However The Hopkins win was more exciting and historical, but Pavlik didnt real get busted up like the others, which make them worser in contrare
                thats the ****ed up part

                Comment


                • #48
                  cotto's loss is worst because he lost at his best weight while Pavlik lost at hopkinsweight of 170 which isn't even a real weightclass against a bonafide HOFer.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Pavlik got outboxed and decisioned. Cotto got KTFO. The catchweight is a built in excuse for Pavlik and his backers, even tho it really wasn't what decided the fight.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      It's one of the rare cases where a knockout loss was better than a decisioned loss.

                      People like Flawless make me wanna put a ******* in my mouth. Cotto literally gave everything he had, and put up a great fight, he just had nothing left. You would have been more impressed had he got up and just left Margarito beat the **** out of him? It was over, it was the equivalent to getting knocked down and not being able to beat the 10 count, it was just from an accumulation than from one shot(Which is how Margo does it).

                      Pavlik was just outclassed, it looked like he had no business in the ring. Cotto engaged in a brutal war, in which he almost came out on top and fell just short. I don't see how this is even an argument.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP