Tweet
so who had the worse loss out of the two...cotto after quitting the 11th round to marg.....or pavlik get his ass handed to him by b-hop......
-
78cotto24.36%19pavlik70.51%55they both suck so whats the point of asking?5.13%4 -
Worser?... -
Pavlik, he barely won a round and got taken to school by a 43 year old Hopkins, although Hopkins is a great fighter.
Cotto won the majority of the first 6 rounds before getting worn down by Margarito, at least he looked like he could win the fight. Pavlik didn't look like he could win the fight at all.Comment
-
-
true..but i remember someone said cotto loss was worser than pavliks because he quitted...but at least he fought back till he couldn't fight no more...pavlik was stumbling to wind up punches from b hop....thats embrassing....Originally posted by Silencers View PostComment
-
detluv takes the loss on this one.Comment
-
Cotto's loss was more gruelling, he got worn down until he couldn't take anymore, so in that regard it was worse but at least he was competitive in the fight and on my card was winning the fight at the time it was stopped. Whereas Pavlik was never in the fight against Hopkins.Originally posted by detluv View PostComment
-
Originally posted by detluv View Post
Worse...matey, Anyway i think Pavlik's loss was pretty bad to be honest, Cotto was hitting Rito with everything but the kitchen sink, Pavlik couldnt even land anything significant throughout the fight.Comment
-
Boxing rule #1- Never Quit.Comment
-
yeah that right...till you get brain damage and end up like gerald mcclellanOriginally posted by Darkstar View PostComment
Comment