so who loss was worser?

[StillUnknown]

cotto was competitive for most of that fight, Pavlik was never in it at all.

[THE REED]

"worser".....

[larryx]

"worser".....

yea he said it worser!!!!!!!!!!!! lol

[Fenom]

Worser?...

right

[extracurRICular]

right

Doode....plz tell me you know the name of that broad on your sig!!!!

[BlackHat]

worse - worser - worst

[The Hammer]

Pavlik's loss was worse for several reasons:

Margarito was a younger fighter
Cotto won most of the earlier rounds
Cotto fought more skillfully, landing lots of punches

[KingTito]

Definitely Pavlik. Cotto was handling Margarito until Margarito got to him. There is definitely hope for Cotto, and he can without a doubt win a rematch if he fights the right fight. Pavlik just got dismantled from start to finish, and there's no reason to think that he would beat B-Hop in a rematch.

[AntonTheMeh]

[TheManchine]

true..but i remember someone said cotto loss was worser than pavliks because he quitted...but at least he fought back till he couldn't fight no more...pavlik was stumbling to wind up punches from b hop....thats embrassing....

"quitted"

Detluv where the **** did you learn english?

"worser"