Who has the better resume at 130? Floyd Mayweather or Manny Pacquaio?

[wmute]

did he beat duran and hearns at smw

yes he did, at 147 and later at 168. Great names, does that make it a great 168 resume? For example Jones 'only' beat Toney. And Calzaghe 'only' beat Kessler, Eubank and so on. All of which are certainly below Duran and Hearns.

[flipbjefrox]

yes he did, at 147 and later at 168. Great names, does that make it a great 168 resume? For example Jones 'only' beat Toney. And Calzaghe 'only' beat Kessler, Eubank and so on. All of which are certainly below Duran and Hearns.

those two were never proven at smw... never held a title to begin with

[wmute]

those two were never proven at smw... never held a title to begin with

Exactly my point

[drez24]

Very surprised that Pac is winning this poll, although I guess I shouldn't be.

Mayweather's dominant victory over a prime Chico is way better than any Pac win at 130, which was probably the second Morales fight (against a fighter in his twilight).

somewhere earlier in the thread I read how Barrera was being defended as still at the top of his game when he fought Pac because he put together a 6 fight streak against tough opposition. Did you count Mzonke Fana in that? Or the first Juarez fight which many believe was a loss or a draw? (not sure if this was responded to, I didn't go through the whole thread)

[Sonic Flood]

Thread Close.. Pac wins

[Da Hammer]

its obviously Pac he beat several HOF fighters its not even close! not knocking mayweather but at 130 Pac clearly had the better resume and some say Corrales was the best win which is debatable but i still stay Pac's win over Barrera in the first fight was the best win by either fighter he dominated Barrera when he was still in his prime i think was the #2 P4P best figher at the time!

[drez24]

its obviously Pac he beat several HOF fighters its not even close! not knocking mayweather but at 130 Pac clearly had the better resume and some say Corrales was the best win which is debatable but i still stay Pac's win over Barrera in the first fight was the best win by either fighter he dominated Barrera when he was still in his prime i think was the #2 P4P best figher at the time!

Several OLD HOF fighters. You say that Corrales being the best win is debatable... do you care to debate that at state your reasons why? Finally, the first Barerra fight was at 126, not 130.

[Sonic Flood]

Several OLD HOF fighters. You say that Corrales being the best win is debatable... do you care to debate that at state your reasons why? Finally, the first Barerra fight was at 126, not 130.

Old? Do you know the meaning of old ****? Pac fought the 3 HOF on their 20's.. Morales was 28 year old then..

The age gap is very close.. It's 1-3 year difference in age between the 3 Mexican Greats and Pacquiao.

What a loser crybabies are.

[drez24]

its obviously Pac he beat several HOF fighters its not even close! not knocking mayweather but at 130 Pac clearly had the better resume and some say Corrales was the best win which is debatable but i still stay Pac's win over Barrera in the first fight was the best win by either fighter he dominated Barrera when he was still in his prime i think was the #2 P4P best figher at the time!

Old? Do you know the meaning of old ****? Pac fought the 3 HOF on their 20's.. Morales was 28 year old then..

The age gap is very close.. It's 1-3 year difference in age between the 3 Mexican Greats and Pacquiao.

What a loser crybabies are.

Old as far as mileage on the odometer goes, yes. Morales had been in several wars by the time he and Pac first fought (and he still beat him, suck it), Barrera was going life and death with the likes of Rocky Juarez by the time they fought at 130, and lets face it, JMM has been around the block, even getting into a few slug fests after losing to John before facing Pac the second time. Were you going to make a point or just make several poor ad hominem attacks?

[wmute]

Old? Do you know the meaning of old ****? Pac fought the 3 HOF on their 20's.. Morales was 28 year old then..

The age gap is very close.. It's 1-3 year difference in age between the 3 Mexican Greats and Pacquiao.

What a loser crybabies are.

LOL 28yo Morales beat Pacman. Remember Morales never won after 2004, except against Pacman. He lost to Barrera, Raheem and Diaz

Marquez 2 happened when was marquez was 34.

Barrera 2 happened when Barrera was 33.

We are talking about resumes at 130.

Genaro Hernandez was 32 and unbeaten at 130, including 13 title fights.

Corrales was 23 unbeaten at 130, including 5 title fights.

Jesus Chavez was 29 and hadnt a single loss since his 5th pro fight. (4 years and some at 130)

Genaro Hernandez alone was younger than Barrera and Morales and with more wins at 130 in title fights than Barrera, Marquez and Morales altogether.

Mayweather beat him with less than 20 pro fights under his belt.

Is Hernandez (or Corrales) better than any of the above 3 p4p? NO

Is beating at 130 (dominating) him a better achievement then beating the aged legendary 126 fighters? HELL YES. Or Leonard has the greatest resume at 168 ever.