roy jones fought no bodies almost his entire career

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SkilledB
    on my grind
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 2285
    • 114
    • 98
    • 9,344

    #31
    Originally posted by Bad_Barracuda
    I second that.
    i got tha rope dawg

    Comment

    • Eaner0919
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2004
      • 8625
      • 370
      • 80
      • 15,578

      #32
      Originally posted by kenso
      he has no "legacy"

      i welcome all the neg rep.

      roy jones is over rated and should have never been #1 p4p, what #1 p4p fighter was still fighting no bodies?

      by all means jones was extremely talented but jesus christ, who the **** did he beat?

      he beat hopkins and toney 3049853583 years ago, and thats it.
      what do

      Hopkins
      Toney
      Eric Lucas
      JC Gonzalez
      John Ruiz
      Antonio Tarver

      have in common besides losing to Jones?

      Comment

      • Derranged
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 46593
        • 2,126
        • 1,351
        • 162,628

        #33
        Roy Jones win over Hanshaw>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenso

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #34
          The thread starter goes a bit far.

          In terms of raw natural talent, Jones is the best Ive seen in my lifetime. In terms of opposition, hes very disappointing. He beat Toney and then just seemed to be content taking easy fights on HBO for a large portion of the paycheque.

          There are so many people on this forum that think the guy was God though so its hard to really get your view across without being attacked or tagged a "hater".

          Comment

          • El Dominicano
            Banned
            • Aug 2007
            • 10074
            • 226
            • 49
            • 10,758

            #35
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            The thread starter goes a bit far.

            In terms of raw natural talent, Jones is the best Ive seen in my lifetime. In terms of opposition, hes very disappointing. He beat Toney and then just seemed to be content taking easy fights on HBO for a large portion of the paycheque.

            There are so many people on this forum that think the guy was God though so its hard to really get your view across without being attacked or tagged a "hater".
            That is true. Saying anything negative about RJJ is like saying F.uck Castro in Cuba.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #36
              Originally posted by El Dominicano
              That is true. Saying anything negative about RJJ is like saying F.uck Castro in Cuba.
              That's partially because the standards he's held to are ludicrous.

              If he beats Ruiz, then he should've fought Lewis.

              If he cleaned out the division but one, he should've fought that one. (LHW)

              If he beats the best in the division, he should've cleaned out the division. (Toney)

              Your favorite fighter dreams he had Jones' resume. Jones WAS a disappointment because he's probably the most talented fighter ever, hence, should've been the greatest fighter ever. But he's not that far from that.

              Comment

              • ICEMAN JOHN SCULLY
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2005
                • 6552
                • 737
                • 48
                • 19,334

                #37
                Words to the wise.... just because a person isn't undefeated, famous or because YOU haven't heard of them does not make them bad fighters. I don't care what any critic on earth says, RJ over his entire career fought some VERY solid professional competition!

                Comment

                • El Dominicano
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 10074
                  • 226
                  • 49
                  • 10,758

                  #38
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  That's partially because the standards he's held to are ludicrous.

                  If he beats Ruiz, then he should've fought Lewis.

                  If he cleaned out the division but one, he should've fought that one. (LHW)

                  If he beats the best in the division, he should've cleaned out the division. (Toney)

                  Your favorite fighter dreams he had Jones' resume. Jones WAS a disappointment because he's probably the most talented fighter ever, hence, should've been the greatest fighter ever. But he's not that far from that.
                  AND fighting Lewis would have been a win win situation. People don't mention that...A win win situation isn't something to run away from. I still can't belive he would drain himself and lose all that hard earned muscle just to fight Tarver

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #39
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    That's partially because the standards he's held to are ludicrous.

                    If he beats Ruiz, then he should've fought Lewis.

                    If he cleaned out the division but one, he should've fought that one. (LHW)

                    If he beats the best in the division, he should've cleaned out the division. (Toney)

                    Your favorite fighter dreams he had Jones' resume. Jones WAS a disappointment because he's probably the most talented fighter ever, hence, should've been the greatest fighter ever. But he's not that far from that.
                    Shouldnt he be held in such high standards though? He clearly holds himself there and his legion of devoted fans hold him there. So why complain about it?

                    Becoming a heavyweight titlist is a great achievement for any fighter who started at Middleweight. Beating John Ruiz is hardly in the same bracket. James Toney did it too (roids or not) so perspective needs to be found.

                    Surely fighting the best and cleaning out the division should go hand in hand, no?

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #40
                      Originally posted by ICEMAN JOHN SCULLY
                      Words to the wise.... just because a person isn't undefeated, famous or because YOU haven't heard of them does not make them bad fighters. I don't care what any critic on earth says, RJ over his entire career fought some VERY solid professional competition!
                      But Roy Jones was more than a very solid fighter. He was majestic. But his opposition wasnt anywhere near that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP