Did Roy Jones Jr Duck Nigel Benn?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #321
    Originally posted by bsrizpac
    The ONLY REASON Joe is taking the fight with Roy now is that he is past his prime and has something to gain. Roy has done Joe a favor by giving him a fight that will prop up his lame "legacy". Joe had it all to lose by taking difficult fights in his prime but he never did. Now, he can fight Roy and win or lose yet still come out with credibility for whatever effort he puts up because everyone thinks Roy is a legend anyway.

    Yeah you are on "another level" : of ****sucking fanboyism.
    No. As you constantly remind us. Joe has very little to gain from taking this fight. Except financially.

    If Joe had been given a chance to fight Roy in his prime, he could lose and go home with his head high because he lost to someone that many considered one of the greatest of all time. Hardly career-ruining. Whereas if Jones had been beaten by an unknown Welshman.........different story.

    Comment

    • hishaam15
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 1504
      • 55
      • 79
      • 7,711

      #322
      wasnt this thread about if roy ducked benn? whys DM being mentioned lol?!

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #323
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        Because Hill and Maske were 1 and 2 in the Ring Rankings which would equate to a fight for the Ring Belt today.

        Dariusz had a choice of what?
        Oh...so being #1 and #2 in Ring qualifies you for the LINEAL title?

        Man, STFU.[/QUOTE]

        Qualifies you for the Ring Belt. Chase argued that Dariusz never held the Ring Belt. When in reality, he should have.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #324
          Originally posted by dirk Diggler Uk
          joe Has Very Little To Gain From Taking This Fight. Except Financially.

          Lmao...

          Comment

          • bsrizpac
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2004
            • 6837
            • 289
            • 21
            • 7,134

            #325
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            No. As you constantly remind us. Joe has very little to gain from taking this fight. Except financially.

            If Joe had been given a chance to fight Roy in his prime, he could lose and go home with his head high because he lost to someone that many considered one of the greatest of all time. Hardly career-ruining. Whereas if Jones had been beaten by an unknown Welshman.........different story.
            Joe has everything to gain amongst the ****** unwashed idiot fanboys and general population. In REALITY he has nothing to gain but the impression if he beats Jones will be good to the average dolt. Did you miss that part?


            Didn't Joe and all his fanboys (aka YOU) always couch his legacy on being "undefeated"? Yup. Isn't that what 90 percent of his legacy is based on ACCORDING TO HIS OWN fans on here? Yup.

            So the point still stands. Joe had everything to lose: aka his record. Point still stands, nice try though.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #326
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              Oh...so being #1 and #2 in Ring qualifies you for the LINEAL title?

              Man, STFU.
              Qualifies you for the Ring Belt. Chase argued that Dariusz never held the Ring Belt. When in reality, he should have.[/QUOTE]

              Oh ok. Because you made a post that Hill won the linear crown from Maske. Just wanted to steer you right again .

              Ring Belt doesn't equal Linear Title.

              Comment

              • bsrizpac
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2004
                • 6837
                • 289
                • 21
                • 7,134

                #327
                Originally posted by hishaam15
                wasnt this thread about if roy ducked benn? whys DM being mentioned lol?!
                Because Dirk will come up with anything to whine about how a Yank was never the best because he ducked everyone.

                Comment

                • bsrizpac
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 6837
                  • 289
                  • 21
                  • 7,134

                  #328
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  Qualifies you for the Ring Belt. Chase argued that Dariusz never held the Ring Belt. When in reality, he should have.
                  Oh ok. Because you made a post that Hill won the linear crown from Maske. Just wanted to steer you right again .

                  Ring Belt doesn't equal Linear Title.[/QUOTE]

                  Dirk Needs to look up basic boxing concepts like "Linear title". Not a shock as he is not a boxing fan but more of UK anti US fanboy.

                  Will he admit he has been proven wrong yet again? All signs point to "no ****ing way will he man up".

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #329
                    Originally posted by bsrizpac
                    Joe has everything to gain amongst the ****** unwashed idiot fanboys and general population. In REALITY he has nothing to gain but the impression if he beats Jones will be good to the average dolt. Did you miss that part?


                    Didn't Joe and all his fanboys (aka YOU) always couch his legacy on being "undefeated"? Yup. Isn't that what 90 percent of his legacy is based on ACCORDING TO HIS OWN fans on here? Yup.

                    So the point still stands. Joe had everything to lose: aka his record. Point still stands, nice try though.
                    No. Not really. You have an obsession with trying to predict everyones opinions to suit your arguments.

                    Being undefeated for 45 fights, including 20+ world title fights is impressive but it doesnt define Calzaghe. A loss to Roy Jones didnt hurt Hopkins who went on to achieve similar feats to Joe at Middleweight.

                    At the end of the day .........Roy had everything to lose by fighting any of these guys.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #330
                      Originally posted by bsrizpac
                      Because Dirk will come up with anything to whine about how a Yank was never the best because he ducked everyone.
                      Man, I'm still waiting for him to share with us this "common" belief that Benn was the hardest hitter in the sport, pound for pound.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP