Mayweather Whooped Diego Corrales and he was 6'1, and Mayweather is 5'7 or waleva..

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • warp1432
    the mailman
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 14406
    • 478
    • 347
    • 24,060

    #31
    Originally posted by Tengoshi
    This is correct, Corrales was 5'10.5, not 6'1. Significant difference.
    He's 6ft. There are various interviews saying he is and his own website said that.

    Comment

    • TheGreatA
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 14143
      • 633
      • 271
      • 21,863

      #32
      Originally posted by Flawless 2
      WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

      Thank you very much, boxer like Tyson and Marciano were smart boxer. They made their disadvantage to an advantage

      Comment

      • Left Hook Tua
        VATNIK
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 62306
        • 7,010
        • 1,581
        • 951,318

        #33
        Originally posted by TheManchine
        Marciano and Tyson both thought that their short arms and height were actually made into an advantage because when they were able to get inside the opponent's reach, the longer armed, taller opponent cannot do anything but clinch while Marciano and Tyson are able to generate great power from a close distance.

        It's the same with Tua except Tua wasn't as good at closing the distance.
        Maybe the weight slowed him down...
        shorter arms can be an advantage SOMETIMES but generally it is a disadvantage.

        marciano and tyson were 2 great fighters that were able to overcome size/reach advantages. but general rule is longer reach is an advantage.



        as far as tua. the weight did slow him down. he was at his best at 210-215. also another disadvantage tua has is his era had much larger opponents that rocky's or even mike's to a slight degree. most of rocky's opponents were around 6 foot or so for the most part which isn't too bad for the 5'10 rocky. in today's era 6'2 or 6'3 guys are considered small heavyweights.

        Comment

        • LEFTYGUNZZ
          GUNZ 4 HIRE
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 4264
          • 218
          • 184
          • 10,891

          #34
          Originally posted by Flawless 2
          When did reach become a problem in boxing, Tyson had no problem beating guys taller than him.
          I beg to differ sir look at his losses

          Tyson is listed at 5'10 -11
          Douglas 6'4
          Lewis 6'5
          Holyfield 6'2
          McBride 6'6
          Williams 6'3
          Now he did beat some bigger HW but at 5'10-11 there arent much HW that are smaller height wise then him. But in comparision excluding Holy 4 or more inches is considerably bigger. Holy is Tyson is 5'10 is 4 inches bigger. I still thinki Tyson is closer to 5'11 but I am not an offical governing body so be it....Lefty

          Comment

          • Miburo
            Double X
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 9112
            • 515
            • 356
            • 18,175

            #35
            Originally posted by warp1432
            He's 6ft. There are various interviews saying he is and his own website said that.
            Height is always being exaggerated. There are many sources which contradict your claim.

            Comment

            • Left Hook Tua
              VATNIK
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 62306
              • 7,010
              • 1,581
              • 951,318

              #36
              Originally posted by Flawless 2
              If a fighter as super fast hands like RJJ, does that make it an disadvantage to their opponents.

              If a fighter as massive power like Foreman, does that make it an disadvantage to their opponents.
              actually it is.

              i don't think you understand what advantage or disadvantage is.

              if someone is faster it's a disadvantage. if someone is stronger it's a disadvantage.

              anything that gives you an edge is an advantage.

              anything that gives your opponent an edge is a disadvantage.

              that doesn't mean they'll win but it's a advantage/disadvantage nonetheless.

              Comment

              • The Hammer
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 50797
                • 3,416
                • 8,704
                • 58,851

                #37
                Originally posted by TheManchine
                Marciano and Tyson both thought that their short arms and height were actually made into an advantage because when they were able to get inside the opponent's reach, the longer armed, taller opponent cannot do anything but clinch while Marciano and Tyson are able to generate great power from a close distance.
                If you don't think a long reach is an advantage in boxing, then you must not have ever been in a ring yourself.

                A few people like Marciano, Hatton and Tyson learned to fight very well on the inside to compensate for their shorter arms, but if you watch the later rounds of Hatton vs. Mayweather and you can see Mayweather's reach enabled him to land punches at a distance.

                Watch Tyson vs. Lewis. Can you honestly say Lewis 84" reach didn't give him an advantage?

                Comment

                • warp1432
                  the mailman
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 14406
                  • 478
                  • 347
                  • 24,060

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Tunney
                  If you don't think a long reach is an advantage in boxing, then you must not have ever boxed.

                  A few people like Marciano, Hatton and Tyson learned to fight very well on the inside to compensate for their shorter arms, but if you watch the later rounds of Hatton vs. Mayweather and you can see Mayweather's reach enabled him to land punches at a distance.

                  Watch Tyson vs. Lewis. Can you honestly say Lewis 84" reach didn't give him an advantage?
                  Wouldn't have mattered anyway since Tyson was throwing only one punch at a time and Lewis had better speed.

                  Comment

                  • Flawless 2
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 3596
                    • 113
                    • 77
                    • 4,134

                    #39
                    Originally posted by luckylefty731
                    I beg to differ sir look at his losses

                    Tyson is listed at 5'10 -11
                    Douglas 6'4 Fair lost
                    Lewis 6'5 PAST HIS PRIME
                    Holyfield 6'2 No excuses
                    McBride 6'6 HE WAS SHOT
                    Williams 6'3 HE WAS SHOT and was winning until knee injure


                    Now he did beat some bigger HW but at 5'10-11 there arent much HW that are
                    smaller height wise then him. But in comparision excluding Holy 4 or more inches is considerably bigger. Holy is Tyson is 5'10 is 4 inches bigger. I still thinki Tyson is closer to 5'11 but I am not an offical governing body so be it....Lefty
                    What about those fighters taller than him that he beat that you did not name. Watch TheMachines video, his opponents average height was 6'2 or 6'3

                    Comment

                    • Left Hook Tua
                      VATNIK
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 62306
                      • 7,010
                      • 1,581
                      • 951,318

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Flawless 2
                      I don't fell you.

                      It's a minor problem, if you can't learn to fight on the inside and complain about reach don't box.
                      a minor problem is STILL a problem.

                      you had difficulties with word problems in school as a child huh?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP