The Top 3, who's better? Shane, Oscar, Tito?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I don't like Vargas but the **** coming out your mouth is bull****. Vargas had NO signs of wear and tear in the De La Hoya fight. Yeah, it was really Tito.. why then did he go on a 4 fight winning streak after his loss to Oscar? I think it was a combination of those two fights and the roids he was taking to cut weight followed by his eating and drinking habits in between fights after those two.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't like Vargas but the **** coming out your mouth is bull****. Vargas had NO signs of wear and tear in the De La Hoya fight. Yeah, it was really Tito.. why then did he go on a 4 fight winning streak after his loss to Oscar? I think it was a combination of those two fights and the roids he was taking to cut weight followed by his eating and drinking habits in between fights after those two.Comment
-
Oscar had the easier time with Mayorga and stopped Vargas one round sooner than Tito. Vargas gave Tito all he could handle. Tito looked beat up and spent after the Fernando fight. While Oscar vs Vargas was competitive, Oscar didn't have as hard a time with Vargas as it appeared Tito did. And Fernando was on steriods against Oscar.
So I voted Oscar. And like Silencers stated above, I believe he should have got the nod against Tito and Shane in the second fight. (Maybe even the first, it was damn close).
Please. That fight was not even as close as the scorecards indicated. Mosley clearly beat Delahoya and if there was any doubt he kicked Oscars ass in the last round. Try actually watching the fight instead of cheerleading Delahoya.Last edited by joseph5620; 09-29-2008, 02:04 PM.Comment
Comment