jermain taylor vs michelle kessler

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #61
    Originally posted by Melly-Mel
    lucky? come on man. don't be a ****. you can feel he lost those fights, but no way can you deny they were close as hell and that says a ton about the kid being a very good fighter. your being ridiculously biased man. anyone who can fight a very competitive and close fight with 2 legends is a good fighter man.
    Where did I say the fights werent close?

    Where did I say he wasnt a good fighter?

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #62
      Originally posted by Flawless.
      JT has beaten Hopkins Twice and beat WinkyKessler beat Mundine and Andrade

      The Hopkins that JT fought was better than the one Calzaghe fought
      Winky vs Taylor was scored a draw. Once again displaying your utter lack of boxing knowledge.

      You cant even read boxrec properly anymore.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #63
        Originally posted by bsrizpac
        Lol. Dirk's been exposed again.

        ****ing *******. He can't/won't explain his scoring criteria. He won't explain what makes a good boxer in his eyes (other than being from the UK).He can't/won't/doesn't understand what happens in the ring during a fight, but spouts biased nonsense because in the end, he's insecure and dislikes America.
        You say someone "doesnt know how to score" if they thought Hopkins beat Taylor.

        Comment

        • Jan(DK)
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 379
          • 21
          • 0
          • 6,444

          #64
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          Read the post you just quoted.

          Or he could fight one of the plenty light heavyweights out there.
          No offense here, you just stated he haven't fought any elite fighter jet. I simply just ask, who you wants him to fight?

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #65
            Originally posted by Jan(DK)
            No offense here, you just stated he haven't fought any elite fighter jet. I simply just ask, who you wants him to fight?
            No offense but...did you read the rest of that SAME post? Or were you too busy jumping up and down in your boxers to do that?

            Comment

            • Jan(DK)
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Feb 2007
              • 379
              • 21
              • 0
              • 6,444

              #66
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              No offense but...did you read the rest of that SAME post? Or were you too busy jumping up and down in your boxers to do that?
              Do you read what you write? You claimed Kessler next time should fight his first elite fighter. You claim it should not be Taylor but Pavlik.
              My question was, which elite fighter did you think Kessler should have fought before ?

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #67
                Originally posted by Jan(DK)
                Do you read what you write? You claimed Kessler next time should fight his first elite fighter. You claim it should not be Taylor but Pavlik.
                My question was, which elite fighter did you think Kessler should have fought before ?
                He takes a while to understand. Be patient.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Jan(DK)
                  Do you read what you write? You claimed Kessler next time should fight his first elite fighter. You claim it should not be Taylor but Pavlik.
                  My question was, which elite fighter did you think Kessler should have fought before ?
                  No, can YOU read? I said the next elite fighter he BEATS, not FOUGHT. How dense are you? Obviously he fought Calzaghe who is elite. AND LOST.

                  Then I said that if anything, he should be targeting Pavlik NOW.

                  Is that clear enough for you?
                  Last edited by IMDAZED; 09-25-2008, 02:09 PM.

                  Comment

                  • them_apples
                    Lord
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 9797
                    • 1,185
                    • 900
                    • 41,722

                    #69
                    Originally posted by SpArKeD-CoLd


                    jermain taylor schools him, kesslers poor!! people only rate him because he lost to calzaghe?

                    whos he beat? he fights a bunch of german kids, just coz he was the WBC champ people think hes God.

                    I think hes rubbish, jermain taylors clearly in the top 2 best SMW's hes still got a lot left

                    Taylor would win, its pretty rediculous how much praise Kessler get's he's never beat anyone amazing, Taylor has. Taylor also looks much better in the ring.

                    JC isn't even an expert boxer and he beat Kessler, getting a sloppy half assed win over 43 year old B-HOP isn't really proving yourself. Taylor beat a much much better version of Hopkins.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      He takes a while to understand. Be patient.
                      LOL at this clown sticking his nose in and being wrong as usual. We're all used to that now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP