Alot of people in here would be very, very quiet, But wh oknows they will probably say Pavlik was overrated, Or he was no good to begin with. I can already see it coming.
No. It would make me wrong. Which, i've been before, and will be again. No apologies.
And if he doesn't?
If he fights him, and loses, I will apologise for this thread and every post I ever made on the subject and put in my sig "abadger is the dumbest poster in boxingscene history!"
I like Pavlik in this fight, I think Joe is slowing down. But if they fought and Kelly did lose I don't think it would make me look dumb. But I would certainly admit I was wrong.
If he fights him, and loses, I will apologise for this thread and every post I ever made on the subject and put in my sig "abadger is the dumbest poster in boxingscene history!"
I will also eat my hat.
It should never get to the point where we have to make personal exceptions for each other when the boxers we stand behind do not meet our expectations. The problem really centers on Calzaghe and his ambiguous position with boxing fans--One side see's an ATG and undefeated champion and the other sees a protected European boxer hoping to vulture a legendary career off the old american horses who need to be put to rest.
We don't need to apologize to each other for anything boxers do or do not do.
Comment