If Calzaghe Fights And Beats Pavlik...Will That Make You Dumb?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Check
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 16585
    • 677
    • 132
    • 26,287

    #11
    Some of you guys are complete asses. If Pavlik loses we will say hes overrated? What the **** are you ass clowns smoking. Any one with a brain would admit that they were wrong and that it was a great win by Calzaghe. You ******* act like people discredit anyone Joe beats when in reality thats not true. Yeah Lacy is ****, HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN ****. Lacy was overblown and didnt beat anyone worth a ****. Pavlik actually beat solid fighter and wouldn't be scoffed at if Calzaghe won. You guys are *******s. Lacy and kessler didn't beat anyone. So the wins should be discredited. Pavlik is not even in the same realm as that. Use your ****ing heads.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #12
      Originally posted by checkmania
      Some of you guys are complete asses. If Pavlik loses we will say hes overrated? What the **** are you ass clowns smoking. Any one with a brain would admit that they were wrong and that it was a great win by Calzaghe. You ******* act like people discredit anyone Joe beats when in reality thats not true. Yeah Lacy is ****, HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN ****. Lacy was overblown and didnt beat anyone worth a ****. Pavlik actually beat solid fighter and wouldn't be scoffed at if Calzaghe won. You guys are *******s. Lacy and kessler didn't beat anyone. So the wins should be discredited. Pavlik is not even in the same realm as that. Use your ****ing heads.
      That's nonsense. There's no such thing as hindsight and even if there is, it isn't 20/20.

      Comment

      • abadger
        Real Talk
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 6259
        • 242
        • 139
        • 13,256

        #13
        Originally posted by KrisSilver
        Watching a boxing match can make you dumb.

        ****.
        Good point. Before I became a boxing fan, I was widely regarded by my peers as an intelligent, ambitious young go-getter. Now they view me as a cretin. Draw your own conclusions.

        Comment

        • dstew
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 1823
          • 76
          • 49
          • 7,990

          #14
          I just want to see the fight. I can't remember ever conclusively saying one man or the other would win the fight, so no, it would not make me dumb.

          It will shock the hell out of me though if these two don't fight eventually, as much as Calzaghe talks about Pavlik it's like he's got a crush on him or something. Or is trying to promote a future fight. For my own sanity, I'm pretending it's the latter.

          Comment

          • MELLY-MEL...
            Broken, Beat, Scarred
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 11274
            • 1,059
            • 1,667
            • 33,296

            #15
            Originally posted by checkmania
            Some of you guys are complete asses. If Pavlik loses we will say hes overrated? What the **** are you ass clowns smoking. Any one with a brain would admit that they were wrong and that it was a great win by Calzaghe. You ******* act like people discredit anyone Joe beats when in reality thats not true. Yeah Lacy is ****, HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN ****. Lacy was overblown and didnt beat anyone worth a ****. Pavlik actually beat solid fighter and wouldn't be scoffed at if Calzaghe won. You guys are *******s. Lacy and kessler didn't beat anyone. So the wins should be discredited. Pavlik is not even in the same realm as that. Use your ****ing heads.
            good post. it does not make anyone better or worse if they pick wrong. who cares? what matters is that the fight gets made, and the best man wins. thats it. end of story. i like both fighters, pavlik a little more, but couldn't care less if i pick pav and he loses. you win some picks, you lose some picks...........at the end of the day.........it is what it is. i am a boxing fan. i want the big fights regardless of whether my boy wins or loses. fan of the sport always comes first with me!

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #16
              Originally posted by Melly-Mel
              fan of the sport always comes first with me!
              This is a concept a lot of people on these boards have yet to grasp. Instead you get...

              Brit vs. Yank

              My fave fighter vs. yours

              yada, yada.

              And the lengths people go to prove the infallibility of their fighters...yikes.

              Comment

              • Kris Silver
                Kneel 4 Silver,good boy!
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 7798
                • 1,073
                • 3,595
                • 27,245

                #17
                Originally posted by abadger
                Good point. Before I became a boxing fan, I was widely regarded by my peers as an intelligent, ambitious young go-getter. Now they view me as a cretin. Draw your own conclusions.
                I've only ever known you from this 'boxing forum' thus, as a dappy ****. So I can't really comment.

                I have noticed that I've been wearing odd socks more and more lately. On my hands.

                Comment

                • Ryn0
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 11139
                  • 310
                  • 269
                  • 20,767

                  #18
                  Originally posted by checkmania
                  Some of you guys are complete asses. If Pavlik loses we will say hes overrated? What the **** are you ass clowns smoking. Any one with a brain would admit that they were wrong and that it was a great win by Calzaghe. You ******* act like people discredit anyone Joe beats when in reality thats not true. Yeah Lacy is ****, HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN ****. Lacy was overblown and didnt beat anyone worth a ****. Pavlik actually beat solid fighter and wouldn't be scoffed at if Calzaghe won. You guys are *******s. Lacy and kessler didn't beat anyone. So the wins should be discredited. Pavlik is not even in the same realm as that. Use your ****ing heads.
                  Kessler's resume IMO is better than Pavliks. Pavlik has beaten Miranda and Taylor and well thats it. Kessler has beaten perhaps lesser competition (certainly better than Miranda who is a one dimensional slugger) but more of it. He has beaten Beyer, Sicia, Andrade, Sartison, Mundine. 3 of those were or become world Champions. Andrade is fighting for a title next. Pavlik has beaten Miranda and Taylor who many people said before the fight was a rubbish fighter and deserved to lose to Spinks/Winky/Hopkins. Then all of a sudden when he gets rid of Taylor he's a great win for Pavlik.

                  Comment

                  • abadger
                    Real Talk
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 6259
                    • 242
                    • 139
                    • 13,256

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Ryn0
                    Kessler's resume IMO is better than Pavliks. Pavlik has beaten Miranda and Taylor and well thats it. Kessler has beaten perhaps lesser competition (certainly better than Miranda who is a one dimensional slugger) but more of it. He has beaten Beyer, Sicia, Andrade, Sartison, Mundine. 3 of those were or become world Champions. Andrade is fighting for a title next. Pavlik has beaten Miranda and Taylor who many people said before the fight was a rubbish fighter and deserved to lose to Spinks/Winky/Hopkins. Then all of a sudden when he gets rid of Taylor he's a great win for Pavlik.
                    I agree. One opponent does not a resume make, especially when that opponent is Jermain Taylor.

                    Comment

                    • egreezy
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 3602
                      • 250
                      • 498
                      • 10,101

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Melly-Mel
                      good post. it does not make anyone better or worse if they pick wrong. who cares? what matters is that the fight gets made, and the best man wins. thats it. end of story. i like both fighters, pavlik a little more, but couldn't care less if i pick pav and he loses. you win some picks, you lose some picks...........at the end of the day.........it is what it is. i am a boxing fan. i want the big fights regardless of whether my boy wins or loses. fan of the sport always comes first with me!
                      boxing fans want this happen, some calzaghe fans like him and his record more then sport right now it seems.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP