Calzaghe: "Pavlik is Full of Bull****, Overhyped Fighter"

[bsrizpac]

Not until he made Zab do the chicken dance.

Once again avoiding the point and coming up with an irrelevant comeback. Man you are ****ing ******.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Glad that not only can't you score fights, but your opinion now magically trumps the reality of what happened.

Firstly.......are you suggesting all 3 fights were easy to score? And that the outcome of each was clear cut and decisive?

Otherwise why is someone who scored the fight one way a person that "cant score"? Because opinion is still divided over who won.

My opinion is what I go by. Not Nevada judges. The reality of what happened is that Lennox drew with Holyfield. Now my opinion seems to think otherwise.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Ahem, he's a champion that won his title how? how did he get that championship?

Once again you missed the point of the goddamn post. You ****ing ****** fanboy *******.

seriously, try getting in a boxing ring, you might have some idea of what you're talking about other than your rampant lame ass biases.

Your point being what?

You said the Champion doesnt call out the challenger. Pavlik is a champion at 160............Kessler isnt making 160, so the fight happens at 68 where Kessler is the Champ and Pavlik aint ****.

"****ning ****** ass **** fanboy douchebag"

[IMDAZED]

I said Kessler has the best opponent on his record - Calzaghe.

Taylor has Hopkins and Winky on his resume but they should be in the loss column in my opinion.

That would make Taylor's best win what?......Cory Spinks

Haha...and even if I used your twisted logic Spinks is still the best names on both resumes.

You already admitted Taylor has the better resume, a few posts ago. Telling me that Kessler has lost to Calzaghe is like telling me the sky is blue.

That's all for now.

[IMDAZED]

Not until he made Zab do the chicken dance.

You're right. Then people loved him even more.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Once again avoiding the point and coming up with an irrelevant comeback. Man you are ****ing ******.

abadger: "boxers dont get respect until they beat a famous yank"

bsrizpac: "duh....well everyone loved kostya....**** **** ASS........and he was an aussie......FANBOY DOOOOUCHE"

Dirk: "Kostya wasnt really respected until he beat Judah........"

Clear enough for you?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Haha...and even if I used your twisted logic Spinks is still the best names on both resumes.

You already admitted Taylor has the better resume, a few posts ago. Telling me that Kessler has lost to Calzaghe is like telling me the sky is blue.

That's all for now.

And like you said, thats like saying Zab Judah has a great resume. Lots of high profile losses.

Spinks is still the best name? Yeah........if they were fighting at welterweight.

[IMDAZED]

And like you said, thats like saying Zab Judah has a great resume. Lots of high profile losses.

Spinks is still the best name? Yeah........if they were fighting at welterweight.

Actually, I made the Zab reference because you said Kessler has the best name. Too bad he didn't beat that name or...we would count it as a win! LOL.

Sadly, Spinks or not...you've already admitted Taylor has the better resume. Thanks for playing.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Actually, I made the Zab reference because you said Kessler has the best name. Too bad he didn't beat that name or...we would count it as a win! LOL.

Sadly, Spinks or not...you've already admitted Taylor has the better resume. Thanks for playing.

Kessler does have the best name.

Taylor does have a better resume...........too bad he didnt beat the names on it.

So therefore I judge by skillset hence Kessler wins.

Thanks for listening.

[IMDAZED]

Taylor does have a better resume.
Thanks for listening.

You're welcome.