Here is what boxrec has:
Siaca beat Mundine for the WBA title.
Mundine beat Echols in an eliminator for the WBA title
Andrade beat Otis Grant in a WBC title eliminator.
Yes they have all lost, sometimes to not-so-good opposition, in Andrades's case, only to Kessler. Does this make them, 'bad'?
What is your criteria to be 'good'. Be a) Bernard Hopkins, b) Antonio Tarver, c) Glen Johnson, d) Roy Jones, e) Chad Dawson, f) Kelly Pavlik?
Comment