Calzaghe: "Pavlik is Full of Bull****, Overhyped Fighter"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MWMerlino
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 1086
    • 44
    • 77
    • 7,207

    #61
    its extremely entertaining to see Pavlik described as "one-dimensional" and really separates people. If you think Pavlik is one-dimensional you do not have a very good understanding of the sweet science.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #62
      LOL@ Hopkins being old.

      No ****, Joe - we coulda told you that before YOU fought him.

      And then Pavlik is overrated yet you asked to fight him...TWICE.

      Calzaghe sure doesn't make it easy to defend him.

      Comment

      • MANGLER
        Sex Tape Flop Artist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 30142
        • 1,705
        • 2,355
        • 46,598

        #63
        If they both get wins in the next fight it's time to stop talkin and scrap. I think Joe C UD's Kelly.

        Comment

        • bsrizpac
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 6837
          • 289
          • 21
          • 7,134

          #64
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          Hopkins beat the guy that Dawson is about to fight......at a ****in canter. So please dont talk ****e about him not being a legit LHW when he was THE Lhw Champ.

          Kessler, Hopkins, Jones, Pavlik and Dawson - you dont ask much, do you?
          Ah the triangle theory. So because he beat B-hops corpse, that means he's the BEST EVER. That and the GOD OF FIGHTING : KESSLER.

          What does Calzaghes **** taste like ****?

          Comment

          • bsrizpac
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2004
            • 6837
            • 289
            • 21
            • 7,134

            #65
            Originally posted by lparm
            I dont know about the significant names thing because Eubank, Hopkins, Kessler were/are all good fighters and unlike winky, DLH, and Tito they were all equal size to Calzaghe not smaller men. So the "no significant wins" talk is crazy. Give the fighter his dues even if you dont like the person.
            Eubank - old shot to pieces.

            Hopkins - old as ****. Stamina issues, as obvious to anyone who saw the fight and has a brain.

            Kessler- who the **** has he beaten?

            See? This is a fun game that everyone can play nuthuggers.

            Comment

            • Addition
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 8534
              • 306
              • 140
              • 20,828

              #66
              I'm finding it difficult to like Calzaghe.

              Firstly he says he wants Pavlik as that was the fight he wants and then back tracks and fights RJJ.

              He claims Pavlik ducked him twice once after he beats Lacy. Wow, you asked to fight Pavlik when he was green and not even close to being the fighter he is today at the time he had a title shot and he calls that a duck. What a twat Calzaghe is.

              However Pavlik didn't stand a chance then and doesn't stand a chance now. Calzaghe wins by UD.

              Comment

              • TRAVI$
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 6226
                • 351
                • 699
                • 9,891

                #67
                Pavlik you piece of ****
                Try beating Kessler first.

                Comment

                • bsrizpac
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 6837
                  • 289
                  • 21
                  • 7,134

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Addition
                  I'm finding it difficult to like Calzaghe.

                  Firstly he says he wants Pavlik as that was the fight he wants and then back tracks and fights RJJ.

                  He claims Pavlik ducked him twice once after he beats Lacy. Wow, you asked to fight Pavlik when he was green and not even close to being the fighter he is today at the time he had a title shot and he calls that a duck. What a twat Calzaghe is.

                  However Pavlik didn't stand a chance then and doesn't stand a chance now. Calzaghe wins by UD.
                  What are you talking about man? Calzaghe would never lie or change a statement! He's the God of Boxing....careful you might make certain posters commit suicide with these comments.

                  Comment

                  • CiganoBoxer
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 2286
                    • 566
                    • 692
                    • 8,802

                    #69
                    You guys who think pavlics power is gonna win every fight for him need a reality check and fast !
                    I like watching Pavlic i think hes great to watch better than Calzaghe in fact but i still think hes to one dimensional to beat Calzaghe IMO !

                    Comment

                    • P4P Opinion
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 1778
                      • 143
                      • 73
                      • 8,170

                      #70
                      Originally posted by bsrizpac
                      Ah the triangle theory. So because he beat B-hops corpse, that means he's the BEST EVER. That and the GOD OF FIGHTING : KESSLER.

                      What does Calzaghes **** taste like ****?
                      Look, I don't agree with the theory either, but could you please lose your hard-on for Calzaghe for a second? You're getting as predictable as Wlad Owns. Also, I'd rather you thought of a more inventive insult than the standard ****phobic American response, if you really feel the need to insult at all and I wouldn't reccommend it, as it weakens the credibility of your argument.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP