its extremely entertaining to see Pavlik described as "one-dimensional" and really separates people. If you think Pavlik is one-dimensional you do not have a very good understanding of the sweet science.
Calzaghe: "Pavlik is Full of Bull****, Overhyped Fighter"
Collapse
-
What does Calzaghes **** taste like ****?Comment
-
I dont know about the significant names thing because Eubank, Hopkins, Kessler were/are all good fighters and unlike winky, DLH, and Tito they were all equal size to Calzaghe not smaller men. So the "no significant wins" talk is crazy. Give the fighter his dues even if you dont like the person.
Hopkins - old as ****. Stamina issues, as obvious to anyone who saw the fight and has a brain.
Kessler- who the **** has he beaten?
See? This is a fun game that everyone can play nuthuggers.Comment
-
I'm finding it difficult to like Calzaghe.
Firstly he says he wants Pavlik as that was the fight he wants and then back tracks and fights RJJ.
He claims Pavlik ducked him twice once after he beats Lacy. Wow, you asked to fight Pavlik when he was green and not even close to being the fighter he is today at the time he had a title shot and he calls that a duck. What a twat Calzaghe is.
However Pavlik didn't stand a chance then and doesn't stand a chance now. Calzaghe wins by UD.Comment
-
I'm finding it difficult to like Calzaghe.
Firstly he says he wants Pavlik as that was the fight he wants and then back tracks and fights RJJ.
He claims Pavlik ducked him twice once after he beats Lacy. Wow, you asked to fight Pavlik when he was green and not even close to being the fighter he is today at the time he had a title shot and he calls that a duck. What a twat Calzaghe is.
However Pavlik didn't stand a chance then and doesn't stand a chance now. Calzaghe wins by UD.Comment
-
You guys who think pavlics power is gonna win every fight for him need a reality check and fast !
I like watching Pavlic i think hes great to watch better than Calzaghe in fact but i still think hes to one dimensional to beat Calzaghe IMO !Comment
-
Look, I don't agree with the theory either, but could you please lose your hard-on for Calzaghe for a second? You're getting as predictable as Wlad Owns. Also, I'd rather you thought of a more inventive insult than the standard ****phobic American response, if you really feel the need to insult at all and I wouldn't reccommend it, as it weakens the credibility of your argument.Comment
Comment