Why isnt JMM calling out Chris John?
Collapse
-
-
Chris John is pretty much irrelevant at this point and you would be hard pressed to find any real boxing fan or knowledgeable expert who would suggest a rematch to avenge the loss. It is just not worth the effort where there are bigger opportunities. JMM going after Hatton is ovbiously a pretty clever swipe at Pacquiao and it seems like JMM is out to make his own name. I still find it laughable that you and your fellow countrymen are discrediting the Casamayor win and the possible bout with Hatton seeing the physical disadvantages. I thought Floyd Mayweather fans were the worst. Now I'm starting to miss them.Comment
-
Chris John is pretty much irrelevant at this point and you would be hard pressed to find any real boxing fan or knowledgeable expert who would suggest a rematch to avenge the loss. It is just not worth the effort where there are bigger opportunities. JMM going after Hatton is ovbiously a pretty clever swipe at Pacquiao and it seems like JMM is out to make his own name. I still find it laughable that you and your fellow countrymen are discrediting the Casamayor win and the possible bout with Hatton seeing the physical disadvantages. I thought Floyd Mayweather fans were the worst. Now I'm starting to miss them.
Oh, PAC is ducking Moe, Larry, Curly.... Oh, Pac is taking steroids... Pac is fighting washed up fighters..... And now, you get a taste of the same medicine your countrymen has dished out, and we are the worst.???? LMAO..
Question: Is double standards and hypocricy taught to you people at a young age, or is it inherent in your culture???Last edited by nycbigdog2; 09-17-2008, 01:45 AM.Comment
-
LOL.... Please, this is pathetic... You calling my countrymen the worst when Mexicans here have/is/will always be discrediting every single fight PAC has... You acting like your countrymen dont talk ****....
Oh, PAC is ducking Moe, Larry, Curly.... Oh, Pac is taking steroids... Pac is fighting washed up fighters..... And now, you get a taste of the same medicine your countrymen has dished out, and we are the worst.???? LMAO..
Question: Is double standards and hypocracy taught to you people at a young age, or is it inherent in your culture???
Pacquiao is actually one of the truly blessed fighters to have one of those fights under his belt, when he beat Marco Antonio Barrera the first time, and it was in a dominating fashion.
But, dude... really... Erik Morales was actually really close to out the door by the time Pacquiao avenged his first defeat. No way Zahir Raheem toys with an Erik Morales who still has a lot left. Barrera was on his way out too in the rematch, although I don't think nearly as much as most people say. Marquez is on top of the world, but whether you are a Marquez or Pacquiao fan, I think you should have a problem with saying your fighter clearly won... that fight was razor close, and neither fighter dominated enough to have the clear victory.
Pacquiao did leave some unfinished business at 130 in Soto, Guzman and Valero, because they are all worthy contenders, but I don't think that a fighter has to fight every single worthy contender. They are allowed to pass some over, as long as they are still fighting other worthy contenders... David Diaz is probably a tougher challenge than Edwin Valero. De La Hoya is going to be hard as hell because he is like 20 weight classes bigger than Pacquaio. Ricky Hatton will be very big too.
Pacquiao is the far and away P4P #1 fighter resume-wise. Talent-wise? I don't think you can make the argument that he is far and away ahead, because, even after a 1-0-1 official record against Marquez, I have a problem with anyone saying that Pacquiao has actually separated himself from Marquez in head to head competition.
The only reason that it seems like people only apply these standards to Pacquiao is because he is such a big star that people pay attention. He has a lot of fans and a lot of haters, which is going to breed a lot of idiots.Comment
-
LOL.... Please, this is pathetic... You calling my countrymen the worst when Mexicans here have/is/will always be discrediting every single fight PAC has... You acting like your countrymen dont talk ****....
Oh, PAC is ducking Moe, Larry, Curly.... Oh, Pac is taking steroids... Pac is fighting washed up fighters..... And now, you get a taste of the same medicine your countrymen has dished out, and we are the worst.???? LMAO..
Question: Is double standards and hypocricy taught to you people at a young age, or is it inherent in your culture???Comment
-
It's no different than any other fighter. Rarely do you get a fighter who beats another top, great fighter and there is not a valid excuse.
Pacquiao is actually one of the truly blessed fighters to have one of those fights under his belt, when he beat Marco Antonio Barrera the first time, and it was in a dominating fashion.
But, dude... really... Erik Morales was actually really close to out the door by the time Pacquiao avenged his first defeat. No way Zahir Raheem toys with an Erik Morales who still has a lot left. Barrera was on his way out too in the rematch, although I don't think nearly as much as most people say. Marquez is on top of the world, but whether you are a Marquez or Pacquiao fan, I think you should have a problem with saying your fighter clearly won... that fight was razor close, and neither fighter dominated enough to have the clear victory.
Pacquiao did leave some unfinished business at 130 in Soto, Guzman and Valero, because they are all worthy contenders, but I don't think that a fighter has to fight every single worthy contender. They are allowed to pass some over, as long as they are still fighting other worthy contenders... David Diaz is probably a tougher challenge than Edwin Valero. De La Hoya is going to be hard as hell because he is like 20 weight classes bigger than Pacquaio. Ricky Hatton will be very big too.
Pacquiao is the far and away P4P #1 fighter resume-wise. Talent-wise? I don't think you can make the argument that he is far and away ahead, because, even after a 1-0-1 official record against Marquez, I have a problem with anyone saying that Pacquiao has actually separated himself from Marquez in head to head competition.
The only reason that it seems like people only apply these standards to Pacquiao is because he is such a big star that people pay attention. He has a lot of fans and a lot of haters, which is going to breed a lot of idiots.Comment
-
It's no different than any other fighter. Rarely do you get a fighter who beats another top, great fighter and there is not a valid excuse.
Pacquiao is actually one of the truly blessed fighters to have one of those fights under his belt, when he beat Marco Antonio Barrera the first time, and it was in a dominating fashion.
But, dude... really... Erik Morales was actually really close to out the door by the time Pacquiao avenged his first defeat. No way Zahir Raheem toys with an Erik Morales who still has a lot left. Barrera was on his way out too in the rematch, although I don't think nearly as much as most people say. Marquez is on top of the world, but whether you are a Marquez or Pacquiao fan, I think you should have a problem with saying your fighter clearly won... that fight was razor close, and neither fighter dominated enough to have the clear victory.
Pacquiao did leave some unfinished business at 130 in Soto, Guzman and Valero, because they are all worthy contenders, but I don't think that a fighter has to fight every single worthy contender. They are allowed to pass some over, as long as they are still fighting other worthy contenders... David Diaz is probably a tougher challenge than Edwin Valero. De La Hoya is going to be hard as hell because he is like 20 weight classes bigger than Pacquaio. Ricky Hatton will be very big too.
Pacquiao is the far and away P4P #1 fighter resume-wise. Talent-wise? I don't think you can make the argument that he is far and away ahead, because, even after a 1-0-1 official record against Marquez, I have a problem with anyone saying that Pacquiao has actually separated himself from Marquez in head to head competition.
The only reason that it seems like people only apply these standards to Pacquiao is because he is such a big star that people pay attention. He has a lot of fans and a lot of haters, which is going to breed a lot of idiots.
Good post... And, I agree.
The thing is that you have nuthuggers on both sides and for anyone to suggest one is worst than the other is being less than honest....
The difference here is that noone from my side will ever say JMM sucks.... We may criticize his opponents but you will be hard pressed to find negative feedback on skills or talent aspect... JMM is one of the best out there and it is non debatable and obvious... However, all of this flack is merely a backlash from countless threads attempting to discredit PAC's triumphs which JMM is actually experiencing presently...Comment
-
You act as if noone can read you.... You start off by discrediting PAC and on your last sentence you say, "PAC is one of my favorite fighters"....LOL...
I know you v2...You're not original... You can give as many backhanded compliments all you want but you are a hater...although maybe politcal correct, but nontheless, a hater...
Oh, and if I did only speak about PAC does that make you "better" than me????...LMAO.... Who has high school mentality again???Comment
-
lol Chris John won't even leave his island I don't think. I mean Marquez already toyed with him and from what I hear about the Thai's, its litterally career suicide if you let them take over the event on fight night and fight on their turf.
But this loss right here really did it for Marquez. He stopped ****in around after this fight, lol he wen't on to tear ass through Asia, and brought that fire back home. Even though he's not what he use to be, he's ****in this **** out like Iron Man.Comment
Comment