First Hatton, then Witter, then Clinton Woods and now Khan

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • warp1432
    the mailman
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 14406
    • 478
    • 347
    • 24,060

    #31
    Yeah ****. What an ignorant yank I must be, eh? But all of those fighters are from england right? That's what I meant...it's late....yeah....

    Comment

    • Scott9945
      Gonna be more su****ious
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2007
      • 22032
      • 741
      • 1,371
      • 30,075

      #32
      Originally posted by Mozza
      Hatton lost to the best fighter in the world. Hardly a big deal. Many of us told you about Witter's limitations, in fact it was idiots like you who bummed him up with the ludicrous suggestion that he would beat and was better than Hatton. Woods didn't show up against Tarver. Khan's weaknesses have been well documented. We all realise that Haye has *****s in his armour too and Calzaghe, whether he loses in the future or not, has already sealed his legacy with an illustrious record with some exceptional performances against top level opponents.

      To surmise, your post is another in the long list of mindless contributions you have offered on here.

      Well done!

      Did they really censor a real word that can be used as derogatory toward Chinese people?

      Comment

      • Pico Hollywood
        ars longa vita brevis
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2005
        • 9354
        • 463
        • 368
        • 17,724

        #33
        Originally posted by Tripmywire99
        Did they really censor a real word that can be used as derogatory toward Chinese people?
        I guess you can't say *****s in armor any more

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP