First Hatton, then Witter, then Clinton Woods and now Khan

[Vladimir303]

David Haye and Joe Calzaghe are Next!!!!

True Story.

[ALT-Assassin]

David Haye and Joe Calzaghe are Next!!!!

True Story.

Why do you insist on being an *******?

[boxasmash]

haye, possible.

calzaghe? no.

u cant tar a whole nation with the same brush dumb nuts, how about this?

first diaz,then williams, then david diaz, then hopkins.

all different skill levels

[Mozza]

Hatton lost to the best fighter in the world. Hardly a big deal. Many of us told you about Witter's limitations, in fact it was idiots like you who bummed him up with the ludicrous suggestion that he would beat and was better than Hatton. Woods didn't show up against Tarver. Khan's weaknesses have been well documented. We all realise that Haye has *****s in his armour too and Calzaghe, whether he loses in the future or not, has already sealed his legacy with an illustrious record with some exceptional performances against top level opponents.

To surmise, your post is another in the long list of mindless contributions you have offered on here.

Well done!

[sparked_85]

Haye will definetely suffer a Khan style blow out at some stage, but you best believe he could to that to Klitschko is he gets that far.

[MELLY-MEL...]

your an idiot. str8 up!

[abadger]

Hatton lost to the best fighter in the world. Hardly a big deal. Many of us told you about Witter's limitations, in fact it was idiots like you who bummed him up with the ludicrous suggestion that he would beat and was better than Hatton. Woods didn't show up against Tarver. Khan's weaknesses have been well documented. We all realise that Haye has *****s in his armour too and Calzaghe, whether he loses in the future or not, has already sealed his legacy with an illustrious record with some exceptional performances against top level opponents.

To surmise, your post is another in the long list of mindless contributions you have offered on here.

Well done!

The way the Yanks hyped Witter solely as a stick to beat Hatton with was hilarious. I'm quite certain nearly every Brit always said Witter was **** anyway, but would they believe it?

[dfwtx]

original and creative!

[Hagler★]

Hatton lost to the best fighter in the world. Hardly a big deal. Many of us told you about Witter's limitations, in fact it was idiots like you who bummed him up with the ludicrous suggestion that he would beat and was better than Hatton. Woods didn't show up against Tarver. Khan's weaknesses have been well documented. We all realise that Haye has *****s in his armour too and Calzaghe, whether he loses in the future or not, has already sealed his legacy with an illustrious record with some exceptional performances against top level opponents.

To surmise, your post is another in the long list of mindless contributions you have offered on here.

Well done!

.............

[Vladimir303]

Many of us told you about Witter's limitations, in fact it was idiots like you who bummed him up with the ludicrous suggestion that he would beat and was better than Hatton.

Find the post where I said that Witter would beat Hatton.

Woods didn't show up against Tarver.

So you're saying if he had shown up he would've beaten Tarver??? Is there some secret greatness in Woods most of us didn't know about???

To surmise, your post is another in the long list of mindless contributions you have offered on here.

Well done!

Calm down princess. This was meant to rile a few people up. Apparently you were one of those people. Cong****.