First Hatton, then Witter, then Clinton Woods and now Khan

[MELLY-MEL...]

The way the Yanks hyped Witter solely as a stick to beat Hatton with was hilarious. I'm quite certain nearly every Brit always said Witter was **** anyway, but would they believe it?

not true at all. many guys around here(brits included)PRAISED WITTER MAN. and he is not **** by any means.

[ALT-Assassin]

The way the Yanks hyped Witter solely as a stick to beat Hatton with was hilarious. I'm quite certain nearly every Brit always said Witter was **** anyway, but would they believe it?

Yanks hyped a British boxer? That can't be true! They only enjoy their own types!

[VaBoriKua 2.0]

Hatton lost to the best fighter in the world. Hardly a big deal. Many of us told you about Witter's limitations, in fact it was idiots like you who bummed him up with the ludicrous suggestion that he would beat and was better than Hatton. Woods didn't show up against Tarver. Khan's weaknesses have been well documented. We all realise that Haye has *****s in his armour too and Calzaghe, whether he loses in the future or not, has already sealed his legacy with an illustrious record with some exceptional performances against top level opponents.

To surmise, your post is another in the long list of mindless contributions you have offered on here.

Well done!

actually hatton lost to Luis Collaso first but collaso got robbed in that fight we all know that.

[sparked_85]

To be fair Witter was hyped only by Yanks and a small handful of Brits (RayCorey?) is a fan I know, the only one I can think of.

The dude has no inside game whatsoever. He would never beat Hatton in a million years.

And I really don't like Hatton.

[Mozza]

Find the post where I said that Witter would beat Hatton.

I will do that right after you find the post where I said you said that.

So you're saying if he had shown up he would've beaten Tarver??? Is there some secret greatness in Woods most of us didn't know about???

Eh, no that's not what I'm saying at all as you would know if you read what you quoted. For the avoidance of doubt, I said that Woods didn't show up against Tarver. I made no claims about the fight other than that.

Calm down princess. This was meant to rile a few people up. Apparently you were one of those people. Cong****.

I'm perfectly calm Prince. I know exactly what you're post was meant to do which is why I have treated it with the contempt it deserves.

[ALT-Assassin]

To be fair Witter was hyped only by Yanks.

The dude has no inside game whatsoever. He would never beat Hatton in a million years.

And I really don't like Hatton.

That proves we are not biased against British fighters

[WLAD OWNS]

Hypejob Haye will get brutally KO'd at heavyweight...It's inevitable.

You can add him to the list of British Hypejob Failures

[Mozza]

actually hatton lost to Luis Collaso first but collaso got robbed in that fight we all know that.

We all don't know that. It was a close fight, I think Hatton won it. You can make a case for Collazo winning but you certainly couldn't call it a robbery.

[abadger]

not true at all. many guys around here(brits included)PRAISED WITTER MAN. and he is not **** by any means.

Honestly, Witter was never really that good. Maybe some Brits liked him, but most I talk to always regarded him as a class below the top level. I really think most of the regard for him on here was exactly what I say, as a Hatton beating stick.

[Mozza]

not true at all. many guys around here(brits included)PRAISED WITTER MAN. and he is not **** by any means.

Some people jumped on the Witter bandwagon after the KO of Harris. Most of us who were familiar with his career beyond that fight knew that while he was capable of such performances they were few and far between and he was wildly inconsistent.