greater fighter, trinidad or chavez?
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Biased? This coming from a guy who would let Floyd piss on his chest if given the opportunity. GTFO! U have nerve calling someone else biased!Comment
-
I would say so. Chavez had better defense, as he rolled with shots well and slipped them effectively too. He did this while coming forward constantly, which is harder to do and still avoid shots. His footwork was better, as Chavez was excellent at cutting off the ring, and Trinidad not so great at it. They were both excellent combination punchers. They were both top-notch at picking their punches for accuracy and to create and exploit openings in their combos. Maybe Chavez has a slight edge in combinations, which is no knock on Tito. I thought Chavez for the most part, was better on the inside, while Tito's speciality was more at mid-range.
I'm not really sure which "skills" I'd say Tito had an advantage on Chavez on. Punching power and speed are more "physical gifts" than "skills", although Tito's ability to do damage were also skill-based too (combo punching, knowing where and when to place a punch to catch them at blind angles, technique).Comment
-
What nonsense? He padded his record with a lot of bums, then when he faced better fighters they usually outboxed him easily. As for Clottey he fought a lot in Ghana, then came the U.S & lost his chance when he was DQ'd against Baldomir. No one really gave him a chance after that except for Margarito then he ****ed that one up too.Comment
-
LOL! you're being bitter about clottey?What nonsense? He padded his record with a lot of bums, then when he faced better fighters they usually outboxed him easily. As for Clottey he fought a lot in Ghana, then came the U.S & lost his chance when he was DQ'd against Baldomir. No one really gave him a chance after that except for Margarito then he ****ed that one up too.Comment
Comment