Pavlik resume nearly good as Calzaghe

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #11
    Originally posted by Flawless
    Lacy = Edison Miranda
    Hopkins = Hopkins if he wins
    Kessler = Taylor
    Eubank = One more experience past his prime fighter and the resume will be the same
    Edison Miranda is ****ing ****e. Guys like Richie Woodhall, Byron Mitchell and Charles Brewer are better than that ****.

    You say Hopkins is Hopkins. But when you compare the Hopkins that fought Taylor to the one that fought Joe, you make it seem like Hopkins was prime when he fought Taylor.

    Kessler and an old Eubank are better than Taylor.

    Comment

    • Flawless
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 4856
      • 182
      • 208
      • 5,849

      #12
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      Edison Miranda is ****ing ****e. Guys like Richie Woodhall, Byron Mitchell and Charles Brewer are better than that ****.

      You say Hopkins is Hopkins. But when you compare the Hopkins that fought Taylor to the one that fought Joe, you make it seem like Hopkins was prime when he fought Taylor.

      Kessler and an old Eubank are better than Taylor.
      The Hopkins that Taylor fought twice was a lot better than the Hopkins who faked low blows to get a time out. Would you not agree?

      Comment

      • Rob_Ga_Jahav_74
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 9
        • 1
        • 0
        • 6,025

        #13
        Kessler is a SUPERIOR boxer to Taylor

        Hi, interesting post.

        However, out of the list of comparisons you list down the only one I can agree is the Miranda-Lacey one.

        You would be wise to youtube Mikkel Kessler and see him in his fights against Andrade and Beyer. He has also beaten Mundine who was on the Contender season 3. He is a FAR stronger boxer than he has been given credit for and I predict over the next 2-3 years he will top the super-middleweight division. I also fancy his chances against Pavlik as he punches hard and has superior boxing skills. He is a superior boxer than Taylor without a doubt.

        As for Eubank being a has been he was actually only 32 when he fought Calzaghe and other than his wars with Watson and Benn he was not damaged goods by this point.

        I REALLY hope Calzaghe takes one more fight if he beats Jones Jr against Pavlik as I am convinced his walk forward style would make Calzaghe look very good and would result in a comfortable points win. This would then hopefully end the "Calzaghe is overrated" type posts.

        Finally, please visit my site if you have a moment. Yes, I am a Calzaghe fan but I do my best not to be too biased on these posts and present facts!

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #14
          Originally posted by Flawless
          The Hopkins that Taylor fought twice was a lot better than the Hopkins who faked low blows to get a time out. Would you not agree?
          So then surely the Hopkins who will fight Pavlik is even worse?

          Or are you a hypocrite?

          Comment

          • Flawless
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 4856
            • 182
            • 208
            • 5,849

            #15
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            So then surely the Hopkins who will fight Pavlik is even worse?

            Or are you a hypocrite?
            Hopkins that Taylor fought is better than the one Pavlik and Hopkins. Hopkins that Pavlik going to fight will be the same Hopkins that fought Calzaghe. Calzaghe fought Hopkins 2 years after Taylor did.

            Comment

            • Flawless
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 4856
              • 182
              • 208
              • 5,849

              #16
              Originally posted by Rob_Ga_Jahav_74
              Hi, interesting post.

              However, out of the list of comparisons you list down the only one I can agree is the Miranda-Lacey one.

              You would be wise to youtube Mikkel Kessler and see him in his fights against Andrade and Beyer. He has also beaten Mundine who was on the Contender season 3. He is a FAR stronger boxer than he has been given credit for and I predict over the next 2-3 years he will top the super-middleweight division. I also fancy his chances against Pavlik as he punches hard and has superior boxing skills. He is a superior boxer than Taylor without a doubt.

              As for Eubank being a has been he was actually only 32 when he fought Calzaghe and other than his wars with Watson and Benn he was not damaged goods by this point.

              I REALLY hope Calzaghe takes one more fight if he beats Jones Jr against Pavlik as I am convinced his walk forward style would make Calzaghe look very good and would result in a comfortable points win. This would then hopefully end the "Calzaghe is overrated" type posts.

              Finally, please visit my site if you have a moment. Yes, I am a Calzaghe fan but I do my best not to be too biased on these posts and present facts!

              www.calzaghe-fight-news.com

              When was Mundine on the contender series, fool. Know your facts

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #17
                Originally posted by Flawless
                Hopkins that Taylor fought is better than the one Pavlik and Hopkins. Hopkins that Pavlik going to fight will be the same Hopkins that fought Calzaghe. Calzaghe fought Hopkins 2 years after Taylor did.
                Who makes up these rules??? You're an absolute joke. Calzaghe fought an older Hopkins than Taylor. And now Pavlik is fighting an even older Hopkins but you argue theres no difference?

                Comment

                • TheManchine
                  Finnish Fraud
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 5119
                  • 247
                  • 343
                  • 12,065

                  #18
                  i dont agree with you Flawless but you could say Pavlik has achieved alot at a young age and is continuing to seek challenges, he is 10 years younger than Calzaghe aswell, i think he has achieved alot so far, he is only 26/27 i think,

                  Comment

                  • ALT-Assassin
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 1931
                    • 55
                    • 17
                    • 2,123

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Flawless
                    Hopkins that Taylor fought is better than the one Pavlik and Hopkins. Hopkins that Pavlik going to fight will be the same Hopkins that fought Calzaghe. Calzaghe fought Hopkins 2 years after Taylor did.
                    The problem is Hopkins backed out a fight with Calzaghe back in 2002.

                    Comment

                    • Dan...
                      Fredette About It
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 7675
                      • 454
                      • 951
                      • 19,200

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Rob_Ga_Jahav_74
                      Hi, interesting post.

                      However, out of the list of comparisons you list down the only one I can agree is the Miranda-Lacey one.

                      You would be wise to youtube Mikkel Kessler and see him in his fights against Andrade and Beyer. He has also beaten Mundine who was on the Contender season 3. He is a FAR stronger boxer than he has been given credit for and I predict over the next 2-3 years he will top the super-middleweight division. I also fancy his chances against Pavlik as he punches hard and has superior boxing skills. He is a superior boxer than Taylor without a doubt.

                      As for Eubank being a has been he was actually only 32 when he fought Calzaghe and other than his wars with Watson and Benn he was not damaged goods by this point.

                      I REALLY hope Calzaghe takes one more fight if he beats Jones Jr against Pavlik as I am convinced his walk forward style would make Calzaghe look very good and would result in a comfortable points win. This would then hopefully end the "Calzaghe is overrated" type posts.

                      Finally, please visit my site if you have a moment. Yes, I am a Calzaghe fan but I do my best not to be too biased on these posts and present facts!

                      www.calzaghe-fight-news.com

                      Perhaps you should just stick to being biased mate.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP