Lets compare Floyd Mayweather with Pernell Whitaker
Collapse
-
-
Flaw chill out man. Pernell beat DLH and you wana know whats funny. You just named 2 of the biggest robbery in the history of boxing. Thats Pernell vs JLM and JCC. Did you know Pernell won every round against JLM?? Not only that JCC only won what 3-4 rounds?! C'mon now!Comment
-
that's an impossible one, I dont agree with everything you typed like I'd give chin to PEA, but accuracy and bodyshots to PBF.
The main thing to which this boils down is that Whitaker was incredible in a more limited game, whereas Mayweather is more "average" in all compartments, and is the most adaptable and complete fighter since Leonard/Duran.
Yes, that is saying a lot, but it is what I see going on in the ring.
So if they ever met, what would do Pea's impeccable game? PBF bag of tricks? And even when assessing them against other greats. Who would do better against who?
NOTE: not saying Pea is a limited fighter in any way, just that PBF literally does it all.Comment
-
its like a mythical prime frazier vs prime tyson bout bro...i'd gladly pay $100 to watch..
pernell, IMO, was probably the greatest defensive fighter i've seen...a southpaw that was slick as ****...brilliant technician with great ring generalship
floyd is an awesome fighter...gifted with boxing fundamentals that only comes thru hard work, and bloodline....if those two fought, honestly, it might the only time we see PBF get frustrated against an opponent...in fact, it might be the only fighter that would force floyd to be more aggressive..and THAT would be a great sight...an agressive floyd vs a smooth-as-silk pernell
A good showcase of skill and a technical masterpiece. But watching these two fight would be like watching a snail race.Comment
-
that's an impossible one, I dont agree with everything you typed like I'd give chin to PEA, but accuracy and bodyshots to PBF.
The main thing to which this boils down is that Whitaker was incredible in a more limited game, whereas Mayweather is more "average" in all compartments, and is the most adaptable and complete fighter since Leonard/Duran.
Yes, that is saying a lot, but it is what I see going on in the ring.
So if they ever met, what would do Pea's impeccable game? PBF bag of tricks? And even when assessing them against other greats. Who would do better against who?
NOTE: not saying Pea is a limited fighter in any way, just that PBF literally does it all.Comment
-
glad someone mentioned that JCC and Ramirez were robberies. We havent seen Floyd fighting at the age at which Pea fought Oscar.
The thing is pbf never clowns in the ring so he was less likely to have got into that bs decisions.Comment
-
Comment
-
What Makavelli said was true. Floyd might actually be the aggressor. This would make for a GREAT fight. You have a really bad imagination by the way.Comment
-
Comment
Comment