Which wins deserves more credit?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ryn0
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2007
    • 11139
    • 310
    • 269
    • 20,767

    #11
    I would pick the "great fighter past his prime" but it depends how far gone that fighter is. Usually the great fighter past his prime would beat the good fighter in prime or great small prime fighter.

    Comment

    • -MAKAVELLI-
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 50080
      • 3,580
      • 2,792
      • 169,000

      #12
      when you say 'A win over a great fighter in his prime but who is naturally smaller'...how much smaller?


      i mean, if you're a WW and you have a great jr WW moving up, then i would put higher value in that...but if that great, smaller fighter is about 2-3 weight classes below then it becomes meaningless

      Comment

      • Left Hook Tua
        VATNIK
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 62306
        • 7,010
        • 1,581
        • 951,318

        #13
        Originally posted by T-97
        Damn, I forgot how Knocked-to-****ery Ruiz got that night

        What did you vote for, And why?
        i give the slight edge to great fighters in their division who are older and past their prime.

        great fighters who are past it are more than likely still good enough to beat good fighters in their prime. depends of course on how past prime they are.

        obviously there's a difference between past prime and being shot.

        Comment

        • Left Hook Tua
          VATNIK
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 62306
          • 7,010
          • 1,581
          • 951,318

          #14
          Originally posted by Ryn0
          I would pick the "great fighter past his prime" but it depends how far gone that fighter is. Usually the great fighter past his prime would beat the good fighter in prime or great small prime fighter.
          past prime to me is somewhere between "slightly slipping in skills" to "completely shot"

          kostya is a good example in the ricky fight.

          he wasn't in top form anymore but he wasn't shot either.

          Comment

          • T-97
            BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 14808
            • 566
            • 628
            • 22,958

            #15
            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
            i give the slight edge to great fighters in their division who are older and past their prime.

            great fighters who are past it are more than likely still good enough to beat good fighters in their prime. depends of course on how past prime they are.

            obviously there's a difference between past prime and being shot.
            Very true,

            That was my problem on it, The degree to which they are past their primes. Ray Robinson lost to Joey Archer, no one with 2 brain cells will rate that win. Hattons win over Tszyu and Calzaghes over Hopkins are both good wins as the 2 older fighters were still rated highly at the time, And were obviously still very skilled fighters.

            Comment

            • Left Hook Tua
              VATNIK
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 62306
              • 7,010
              • 1,581
              • 951,318

              #16
              Originally posted by Makavelli
              when you say 'A win over a great fighter in his prime but who is naturally smaller'...how much smaller?


              i mean, if you're a WW and you have a great jr WW moving up, then i would put higher value in that...but if that great, smaller fighter is about 2-3 weight classes below then it becomes meaningless
              good example would be oscar and tito fighting at 160.

              natural welters who are big enough to be super welters fighting at middleweight.

              Comment

              • T-97
                BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 14808
                • 566
                • 628
                • 22,958

                #17
                Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
                good example would be oscar and tito fighting at 160.

                natural welters who are big enough to be super welters fighting at middleweight.
                To be fair, I wouldn't say at that point Oscar or Tito were Welters as they couldn't make the weight, Or had trouble doing it. I don't ive Hop any credit for Stopping Oscar as he was a **** middleweight. He didn't deserve the win over Sturm in the first place.

                Comment

                • Ryn0
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 11139
                  • 310
                  • 269
                  • 20,767

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
                  past prime to me is somewhere between "slightly slipping in skills" to "completely shot"

                  kostya is a good example in the ricky fight.

                  he wasn't in top form anymore but he wasn't shot either.
                  I still think that Kostya would blast out almost everyone in his division (at the time) on the night that he fought Hatton. The great past prime fighter would beat the good in prime fighter and depending on how big the prime coming up fighter is they would most likely beat them too.

                  Comment

                  • ИATAS
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 36648
                    • 2,509
                    • 1,953
                    • 50,835

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
                    good example would be oscar and tito fighting at 160.

                    natural welters who are big enough to be super welters fighting at middleweight.
                    oscar is a good example, tito is not. Tito was a middleweight champion when he fought bernard, he is currently a light heavyweight and fit very well at middleweight. If not for hopkins he would have cleaned out the division and beat eveyone.

                    Comment

                    • Left Hook Tua
                      VATNIK
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 62306
                      • 7,010
                      • 1,581
                      • 951,318

                      #20
                      Originally posted by T-97
                      To be fair, I wouldn't say at that point Oscar or Tito were Welters as they couldn't make the weight, Or had trouble doing it. I don't ive Hop any credit for Stopping Oscar as he was a **** middleweight. He didn't deserve the win over Sturm in the first place.
                      i understand that. just like manny isn't a featherweight anymore.

                      but it's the fact that they were at their best at that weight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP