De La Hoya-Pacquiao Projected Betting Line, Oscar 2-1

[shadeyfizzle]

I've been saying this since the ****ing beginning, but everyone in here's crying it's such a mismatch. The people who are actually going to be putting money down know it's not such a wide odd fight.

I am definitely not 1 of those crying mismatch. If the fight gets made I'll be puttin down a whole month's salary on Pacman. I'll also lay down all my points here on Pacman if someone is willing to take on the 2 to 1 odds

[bluediamond1196]

[QUOTE=edgarg;3952795]The odds should be at least 5-1 against Manny. This is a mismatch in all but age, and, as the fight progresses, if it's held at all, Manny will be getting more and more desperate trying more and more unsuccessfully, to avoid Oscar's left jab and hook, to get close. Because of his size, and being a southpaw, there's a chance that Manny's head might do some damage....................
Manny gets discouraged if his "blitz" tactics don't work, and really has no other fallback.(/Quote)

The boxing and betting insiders had spoken and many of them knows much more than you know! What I don't understand is, your ultra idolatry with DLH made you not only for your one-sided self-satisfaction opinion but made you also a crying *****! For consolation, DLH is still ahead by 2-1 but far from your 5-1 statistic! Why not let the fight go to see for the result and to erase all pros and cons opinions, huh??!

[z28ss6706]

ill say it again if dlh lands a left hook like marquez it is going to be good night pacman!!

[Da Hammer]

i will probably bet $100 on Pac...

[edgarg]

[QUOTE=bluediamond1196;3954304]

The odds should be at least 5-1 against Manny. This is a mismatch in all but age, and, as the fight progresses, if it's held at all, Manny will be getting more and more desperate trying more and more unsuccessfully, to avoid Oscar's left jab and hook, to get close. Because of his size, and being a southpaw, there's a chance that Manny's head might do some damage....................
Manny gets discouraged if his "blitz" tactics don't work, and really has no other fallback.(/Quote)

The boxing and betting insiders had spoken and many of them knows much more than you know! What I don't understand is, your ultra idolatry with DLH made you not only for your one-sided self-satisfaction opinion but made you also a crying *****! For consolation, DLH is still ahead by 2-1 but far from your 5-1 statistic! Why not let the fight go to see for the result and to erase all pros and cons opinions, huh??!

You're quite entitled to your opinion, but I'm not sure I understand your concoction of mixed metaphors and garbled syntax. What I DO understand is, that with no provocation, you have been very rude to me. I haven't said anything against you, or done anything to offend you. I don't know you.

For your information, myself and several acquaintances, well known boxing writers, exchange opinions when something comes along which merits discussion. Like Manny-Oscar. We are all keen students of boxing, and a couple, like myself have ring experience. I also have judging experience. You it appears have had neither.

I actually had written a long, sharp, response to your unwarranted attack, but just now scrapped it, you wouldn't have understood it.

If all this is too much for you, then DON'T read it....................

[edgarg]

[QUOTE=edgarg;3955441]

You're quite entitled to your opinion, but I'm not sure I understand your concoction of mixed metaphors and garbled syntax. What I DO understand is, that with no provocation, you have been very rude to me. I haven't said anything against you, or done anything to offend you. I don't know you.

For your information, myself and several acquaintances, well known boxing writers, exchange opinions when something comes along which merits discussion. Like Manny-Oscar. We are all keen students of boxing, and a couple, like myself have ring experience. I also have judging experience. You it appears have had neither.

I actually had written a long, sharp, response to your unwarranted attack, but just now scrapped it, you wouldn't have understood it.

If all this is too much for you, then DON'T read it....................

Sorry another computer jump. It'll be getting me into trouble one of these days. The above was meant for a some little pimplefacet twit called DIAMOND-something or other.

[The_Italian]

I think the line is reasonable but not accurate.

i see this fight being closer than 2 to 1 in favor of oscar...

by fight night (if the line goes correctly) it should be like cotto v. mosley (ie. damn near even).

i think too many people are putting too much stock into de la hoya's SIZE and EXPERIENCE...pacquiao IS smaller and less experienced (overall) but de la hoya isnt getting any younger and pacquiao is fast and strong (he's been the strongest of his entire career lately).

I see it going to a close split decision that could be in either pacquiao OR de la hoya's favor to be honest.

[JOM'S]

2-1 odds is shiiiitty!!!

[bluediamond1196]

[QUOTE=edgarg;3955441]

You're quite entitled to your opinion, but I'm not sure I understand your concoction of mixed metaphors and garbled syntax. What I DO understand is, that with no provocation, you have been very rude to me. I haven't said anything against you, or done anything to offend you. I don't know you.

For your information, myself and several acquaintances, well known boxing writers, exchange opinions when something comes along which merits discussion. Like Manny-Oscar. We are all keen students of boxing, and a couple, like myself have ring experience. I also have judging experience. You it appears have had neither.

I actually had written a long, sharp, response to your unwarranted attack, but just now scrapped it, you wouldn't have understood it.

If all this is too much for you, then DON'T read it....................

Yap.. you don't know me that's why I commented this way to you.. and you're bragging of your boxing opinions with your little circle boxing "writers?" and with "boxing experienced???" well, i see.. but seem's to me you are not an experienced boxer and an insensetive writer if you really do, because you do not know how an experienced boxer feel when someone like you persecute and ridicule a fighter with your one sided opinion!!! Ya.. you do not know me that's why I commented that way and very personal! One thing is for sure, we are completely the same, I am judging you rudely by your comment and you're judging me rudely by my comment. There was saying that goes this way, Don't look at others dirt on their faces while you have one on your own! just a penny for your thoght...! But I bet.. Pacman had a pretty edge to win and upset the majority of you, just basing on my personal conviction!

[bluediamond1196]

[QUOTE=edgarg;3955441]

You're quite entitled to your opinion, but I'm not sure I understand your concoction of mixed metaphors and garbled syntax. What I DO understand is, that with no provocation, you have been very rude to me. I haven't said anything against you, or done anything to offend you. I don't know you.

For your information, myself and several acquaintances, well known boxing writers, exchange opinions when something comes along which merits discussion. Like Manny-Oscar. We are all keen students of boxing, and a couple, like myself have ring experience. I also have judging experience. You it appears have had neither.

I actually had written a long, sharp, response to your unwarranted attack, but just now scrapped it, you wouldn't have understood it.

If all this is too much for you, then DON'T read it....................

[QUOTE=edgarg;3955445]

Sorry another computer jump. It'll be getting me into trouble one of these days. The above was meant for a some little pimplefacet twit called DIAMOND-something or other.

Yap.. you don't know me that's why I commented this way to you.. and you're bragging of your boxing opinions with your little circle boxing "writers?" and with "boxing experienced???" well, i see.. but seem's to me you are not an experienced boxer and an insensetive writer if you really do, because you do not know how an experienced boxer feel when someone like you persecute and ridicule a fighter with your one sided opinion!!! Ya.. you do not know me that's why I commented that way and very personal! One thing is for sure, we are completely the same, I am judging you rudely by your comment and you're judging me rudely by my comment. There was saying that goes this way, Don't look at others dirt on their faces while you have one on your own! just a penny for your thoght...! But I bet.. Pacman had a pretty edge to win and upset the majority of you, just basing on my personal conviction!