Uh huh. Well that's very nice, but it's not really a revolutionary position to take, is it? I mean it's not like predicting that Douglas will KO Tyson or anything like that, so I just didn't figure it was worth bumping.
Sorry to break it to you but Calzaghe isn't my hero. I've previously started a thread about how bad he was against Hopkins, and I've criticised him several times for not fighting Pavlik.
I realise that for people like yourself, this is hard to take. I mean, the discussion was about how good your prediction was, but you're trying to change the subject to his motives for his choice of opposition, say he padded his record etc.
By the way, Jones is 39, not 40. It doesn't really matter, but the amount you go on about it, you'd think that you would've checked. Unless of course you need to bend the truth and exaggerate in order to strengthen your argument?
The fact that you need to repeat this stuff ad nauseam suggests that you have more of desire to needlessly criticise than I do to needlessly praise. That's why you've set up alts about fighters that you dislike, but I haven't.
Sorry to break it to you but Calzaghe isn't my hero. I've previously started a thread about how bad he was against Hopkins, and I've criticised him several times for not fighting Pavlik.
I realise that for people like yourself, this is hard to take. I mean, the discussion was about how good your prediction was, but you're trying to change the subject to his motives for his choice of opposition, say he padded his record etc.
By the way, Jones is 39, not 40. It doesn't really matter, but the amount you go on about it, you'd think that you would've checked. Unless of course you need to bend the truth and exaggerate in order to strengthen your argument?
The fact that you need to repeat this stuff ad nauseam suggests that you have more of desire to needlessly criticise than I do to needlessly praise. That's why you've set up alts about fighters that you dislike, but I haven't.
Comment