Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

De La Hoya Says Pacquiao Not Worth More Than Floyd

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by DIOS DOMINICANO View Post
    I'm glad that you guys are finally seeing what certain people have been saying all along...OSCAR IS FAKE.
    Those tutu/fishnet pics didn't seem FAKE.

    Comment


    • DLH's a *****. I'm glad this fight ain't happenin.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by javelin_fangs View Post
        Well, I mean it's obvious DLH doesn't want to fight Margarito. Because that's the easiest big fight that he could negotiate. I mean really all he has to do is give Margarito about $5 or 6 mil and the fight could be agreed to in 5 mins.

        BUT Pacquiao is not his only option. Oscar has money...he doesn't need some non-independent tied to Bob Arum dude telling him what to do and how much money to give up. If he's going to make any concessions on the money it's going to be to Tito or Floyd...not to Pacquiao. $20 mil should have been enough for Pacquiao...apparently Pacquiao had to find a reason why it wasn't.
        Oscar's ego demands that he wins his last fight over a name opponent. If you take all the available name opponents, then subtract the ones he (thinks he) can beat, there isn't that much left. If Pacquiao doesn't sign, DLH may postpone his farewell fight until next year when he can maybe get someone like Hatton in the ring.

        As for Pacquiao, he makes millions every year against guys who he can beat. I think he's smart to make a number he wants and stick to it. Like I said, I think he's the one with more leverage. Even without Oscar he still is the lightweight champion with plenty of potential live opponents.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by mangler View Post
          DLH's a *****. I'm glad this fight ain't happenin.
          Me too, now all I have to do is hope Dlh paves the way to a Williams-Margs fight by NOT fighting Margs lol.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Jose Rizal View Post
            Those tutu/fishnet pics didn't seem FAKE.
            They are lol.................

            Comment


            • DELAJOTO IS THE BIGGEST FRAUD IN BOXING!!!! WHAT A ****EN *** THIS ***** IS. UNBELIEVABLE

              Comment


              • Originally posted by edgarg View Post
                Yes how true. We do agree. I'll tell you what DOES upset me though. That you may know that lovely image in your picture, and I don't.
                lol, well I do, and that's all that counts lol...

                Comment


                • Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                  Lmao! It is a fact that Pac offered Marquez 750,000 for a rematch. It is a fact that it would have been by far his biggest payday. It is a fact that he turned it dow yet settled for 25 times less money to face Chris John and lose his title. So tell me lil boof, what have I lied or even insinuated about? You say you've ruined me. Then why did I just take you to school? You won't answer because I have just exposed your lies again. You like to tell tall tales with no facts to back them.

                  How about that Valero ban bet? GOT BALLS Razor? I already know you don't. You like to say its personal for me, yet you are the one who is contantly making up lies about me. Anything I say about you, I can prove. You can't say the same without telling another lie. Have fun moving on. If I were you I would run from me too.
                  Man, get your facts straight. Marquez was offered 750,000 to rematch Pacquiao the first time and turned it down to instead fight Chris John for 30,000. When Pac does fight Valero lets see if you have the balls to man up and make a PERMENANT ban bet.
                  I already know you won't though, or you will just come back under another alt, right Razors Edge?

                  The underlined is your lie lol. Check out the difference between how you change your facts in the post I quoted, and the post I copied. You give us facts, and then leave out the word "instead" and use "settled" lol. Check it out lol. Every last poster here knows Marquez wanted Pac, but wanted more money. He did not turn down PAc to fight John. He was left with no other option, and that's why he fought John. Who cares if it was his biggest payday. Marquez and Nacho should just take it because Arum says so. Why isn't Pac letting Dlh take the big bread when he will still get millions lol? Marquez created the drama too by coming back. He didn't want a lot more money.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Boofdatruth View Post
                    Man, get your facts straight. Marquez was offered 750,000 to rematch Pacquiao the first time and turned it down to instead fight Chris John for 30,000. When Pac does fight Valero lets see if you have the balls to man up and make a PERMENANT ban bet.
                    I already know you won't though, or you will just come back under another alt, right Razors Edge?

                    The underlined is your lie lol. Check out the difference between how you change your facts in the post I quoted, and the post I copied. You give us facts, and then leave out the word "instead" and use "settled" lol. Check it out lol. Every last poster here knows Marquez wanted Pac, but wanted more money. He did not turn down PAc to fight John. He was left with no other option, and that's why he fought John. Who cares if it was his biggest payday. Marquez and Nacho should just take it because Arum says so. Why isn't Pac letting Dlh take the big bread when he will still get millions lol? Marquez created the drama too by coming back. He didn't want a lot more money.
                    The underlined is semantics, not a lie and you know it. Just answer these simple questions. Did Marquez turn down Pac for the highest purse he had ever been offered by far? And did he fight Chris John for 25 times less money? There is no way for you to answer anything but yes to both questions. And if that is the case then you have been caught lying again by saying and insinuating the Pacquiao didn't want the fight but instead waited for him to get old. My facts cannot be disputed, whereas your ASSumptions can.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                      The underlined is semantics, not a lie and you know it. Just answer these simple questions. Did Marquez turn down Pac for the highest purse he had ever been offered by far? And did he fight Chris John for 25 times less money? There is no way for you to answer anything but yes to both questions. And if that is the case then you have been caught lying again by saying and insinuating the Pacquiao didn't want the fight but instead waited for him to get old. My facts cannot be disputed, whereas your ASSumptions can.
                      You just lied though...lol and are now covering your tracks lol. You answer these questions. Did Marquez want more money? Did Marquez choose John over a PAc rematch?...lol We don't live in a "yes and no" world. I'm a scholar of jurisprudence lol.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP