Why do Calzaghe fans deny, lie and distort information.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Best win in terms of what?

His best performance was probably Lacy. A 12 round destruction in one of the most one sided world title bouts ever. Perfect performance.

Kessler was a more significant win but he presented a few more problems for Joe.

Hopkins was significant for the name value and American exposure. It wasnt as hard a fight as Kessler. It was just a crap fight which Hopkins did everything in his power to ruin and spoil. Joe didnt look good but Hopkins looked worse. They both looked utter ****e, that doesnt mean it was a "hard" fight.

[Flawless.]

You say Kessler is the Calzaghe best win?? Who has Kessler beaten that Hopkins has?? Kessler in his prime got dominated while Hopkins put up a fight which he lot in a SD. You meant to base a fighter on his merit not his prime. A prime Kessler wasn’t a match for Calzahe while a past his prime Hopkins was. How can Calzaghe fans say Calzaghe won the Hopkins fight Cleary it was extremely close?

[Flawless.]

Hopkins was significant for the name value and American exposure. It wasnt as hard a fight as Kessler. It was just a crap fight which Hopkins did everything in his power to ruin and spoil. Joe didnt look good but Hopkins looked worse. They both looked utter ****e, that doesnt mean it was a "hard" fight.

If you think the Kessler fight was harder you are extremely bias. Hokins fight was harder due to Hokins tactics. Hopkins was the first fighter to make Calzaghe look bad. There was a reason behind that. Kessler didn’t have a clue what to do.

[majestiC]

So who would win in a fight between Kessler and Hopkins? I think alot of people including me would say Kessler.

[majestiC]

If you think the Kessler fight was harder you are extremely bias. Hokins fight was harder due to Hokins tactics. Hopkins was the first fighter to make Calzaghe look bad. There was a reason behind that. Kessler didn’t have a clue what to do.

No Calzaghe has looked bad in quiet a few fights actually, Bika being his last one where he wasn't at his best.

[Flawless.]

The reason why they say Kessler was Calzaghe best wins

1 They don’t want to say their fighter’s best win was over a 43 year old man which included a knock down.

2 They don’t want an old yank to be his hardest fight

3 Saying Kessler was harder makes Europeans fighters look better, hence helping Calzaghe resume.

4 They are Hoping Kessler becomes a very good fighter years later hence saying that was Calzaghe best win

5 Hopkins made Calzaghe look like an amateur

I really do believe this. Hopkins was the first fighter that made Calzaghe look bad, there is a reason behind it. Hopkins style was harder for Calzaghe not Kessler basic style.

[Dan...]

So who would win in a fight between Kessler and Hopkins? I think alot of people including me would say Kessler.

I would pick Kessler to win. He would simply throw too many punches.

[ALT-Assassin]

No Calzaghe has looked bad in quiet a few fights actually, Bika being his last one where he wasn't at his best.

Wasn't Bika a Contender star?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

If you think the Kessler fight was harder you are extremely bias. Hokins fight was harder due to Hokins tactics. Hopkins was the first fighter to make Calzaghe look bad. There was a reason behind that. Kessler didn’t have a clue what to do.

Sakio Bika didnt exactly make Joe look a million quid either. That doesnt mean it was a harder fight.

Kessler ripped Joe with some perfect right hands and uppercuts for 4 rounds and definitely stunned him.

Hopkins got a flash KD then held, spoiled, butted and pretending to be injured for most of the fight. Joe didnt look good because he was fighting someone who didnt wanna fight.

[Flawless.]

So who would win in a fight between Kessler and Hopkins? I think alot of people including me would say Kessler.

The Hopkins that beat Winky and fought Calzaghe, I got Hopkins UD. How could Kessler even compare to Hopkins now. Hopkins is proven while Kessler isn’t