Why do people think BHop is Joe's biggest win??
Collapse
-
-
Prove you wrong, you said Calzaghe hasn't faced anyone yet he is a two weight current holding world champ who is no2 P4P in the world........ im sick of arguing with 15 year old yanks who know **** all about the European scene and if its dominated by Europeans it's ****.Comment
-
Haha. That article pissed me off too. As for Reid, Brewer, Mitchell and indeed Woodhall's status as ex world champs, it is a funny one. Bottom line is that the US had no interest in SMW at the time because it had been a Brit dominated division for quite a while. As you say, you point out the status of these guys and it all just goes quiet. One analogy I like to make is what may happen to Jermain Taylor in future. Right now he's seen as an 'elite', but if he were to say face Froch and lose, then never get another title, his career would be quite similar to Mitchell. Eight years from now he might very well be regarded exactly the same, with everyone saying "Taylor who?". It wouldn't change the fact that at the time he was seen as a good boxer. People have short memories, or to be fair, maybe just short lives so far.the politics of the time didn't allow for wbc , wba , ibf guys to fight joe to unify. you know that. same reason naseem never held all the belts at once.
i got pissed off when some idiot yesterday was saying joe's defenses don't mean **** because it was a wbo belt. when i pointed out that those 3 all had belts at wbc , wba and ibf before fighting joe......he mysteriously never posted on that thread again.Comment
-
I updated my postProve you wrong, you said Calzaghe hasn't faced anyone yet he is a two weight current holding world champ who is no2 P4P in the world........ im sick of arguing with 15 year old yanks who know **** all about the European scene and if its dominated by Europeans it's ****.Comment
-
Smartest thing I've ever seen you say.Prove you wrong, you said Calzaghe hasn't faced anyone yet he is a two weight current holding world champ who is no2 P4P in the world........ im sick of arguing with 15 year old yanks who know **** all about the European scene and if its dominated by Europeans it's ****.Comment
-
Because Kessler hasn't done anything to call himself a great fighter. Hopkins was a great fighter only two years ago. Kessler has never been. He may be great, but you gotta prove that by beating live bodies.
Hell, nobody thought Calzaghe was anything until 2006 because he hadn't beaten anybody. As long as Kessler keeps fighting these European bums, nobody will ever consider him a great fighter.Comment
-
how can you be considered "great" when your best win is over anthony mundineBecause Kessler hasn't done anything to call himself a great fighter. Hopkins was a great fighter only two years ago. Kessler has never been. He may be great, but you gotta prove that by beating live bodies.
Hell, nobody thought Calzaghe was anything until 2006 because he hadn't beaten anybody. As long as Kessler keeps fighting these European bums, nobody will ever consider him a great fighter.Comment
-
Comment
-
IMO that is Correct.
Is it fair to say that Calzaghe's biggest win and biggest name fights were past there prime?
Old man Eubank made him popular and Grandpa Hop added a great to his resume.
So to answer the question, HOP will go down in the HOF as an ATG/LEGEND. Who else on his record will/has?Comment
Comment