Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

how can Joe Calzaghe achieve P4P 1 status before retiring

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • To answer your question, he is already P4p #1 on my list.

    Beating Diaz means nothing seeing as Pacquiao lost by a good 1-2 points against Marquez.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by abadger View Post
      But who does it say it about? The old guys or the young guys. I think its a bit of both.
      Most definitely. I think it's a positive/negative thing. Positive for the old vets who still compete on such a high level, and negative for the young guns because as long as they vets stay around, their fame will be negated to a certain extent.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by RightHandLead View Post
        Most definitely. I think it's a positive/negative thing. Positive for the old vets who still compete on such a high level, and negative for the young guns because as long as they vets stay around, their fame will be negated to a certain extent.
        It's always been like this, for better or worse.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by JC#1 View Post
          To answer your question, he is already P4p #1 on my list.

          Beating Diaz means nothing seeing as Pacquiao lost by a good 1-2 points against Marquez.
          i agree Diaz is no biggy

          Comment


          • Super Welsh Joe, whose alt are you? Another Ricky one?

            Comment


            • move up to hw and 1st round tko wlad then drop to bantam and take on vazquez and marquez. then he gets p4p # 1 status undisputed

              Comment


              • Calzaghe's combined record (amateur and pro) is 167-7 and he's undefeated in 20 years, all of his amateur losses were SD too. So he's never been decisively beaten.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by JC#1 View Post
                  Calzaghe's combined record (amateur and pro) is 167-7 and he's undefeated in 20 years, all of his amateur losses were SD too. So he's never been decisively beaten.
                  Neither has Bernard Hopkins.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by RightHandLead View Post
                    Neither has Bernard Hopkins.
                    Roy Jones UD which even he admits was a comprehensive loss.

                    Taylor by SD then UD.

                    Calzaghe by SD which most saw as UD.



                    None were tremendously huge but often aren't. But I'd say they were comprehensive, clear wins.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by KrisSilver View Post
                      Roy Jones UD which even he admits was a comprehensive loss.

                      Taylor by SD then UD.

                      Calzaghe by SD which most saw as UD.



                      None were tremendously huge but often aren't. But I'd say they were comprehensive, clear wins.
                      Jones 7 rounds to 5, I don't quite consider that "comprehensive" or "clear".

                      The first Taylor fight nearly everybody agreed that Hopkins won. The second one, was a very close decision loss.

                      Against Calzaghe, myself and many othe rposters here had it 114-113, for Hopkins. As did Adalaide Byrd, Dan Rafael, Brian Kenny, ESPN, and the Associated Press.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP