How well does Calzaghe have to beat Jones for you not to discredit him?

[abadger]

Nut sucker, Huge nut sucker.....

Almot every single one of your posts makes some sort of reference to ****sexuality. Is there something you're not telling us?

[fightnews55]

Almot every single one of your posts makes some sort of reference to ****sexuality. Is there something you're not telling us?

Yeah I think anyone that likes Calzaghe is a ***g, butt pirate, donut puncher, turd burgler, fudge packer, **** spelunker, or ass bandit....

[abadger]

Yeah I think anyone that likes Calzaghe is a ***g, butt pirate, donut puncher, turd burgler, fudge packer, **** spelunker, or ass bandit....

Oh, okay. Great.

[fightnews55]

Your little gif mural proves me right....

[Clegg]

Your little gif mural proves me right....

A mural is a still image, so how exactly does the gif in his sig fit that description?

I know...I'm being picky, I just figured that a guy like you could do with improving his vocabulary. Maybe then you'll have more to say than "balls balls ****" or whatever.

[fightnews55]

A moral is a still image, so how exactly does the gif in his sig fit that description?

I know...I'm being picky, I just figured that a guy like you could do with improving his vocabulary. Maybe then you'll have more to say than "balls balls ****" or whatever.

Who's that in your avater? Your latest ******ation buddy.

[Clegg]

Who's that in your avater? Your latest ******ation buddy.

In my post I made a typo and you didn't even bring it up.

Someone criticises you vocabulary whilst making a spelling mistake in the same sentence, and you don't even mention it? I honestly don't think I would've had a response to that. Oh well...

The kid is from a film called The Innocents, which was based upon the novel The Turn Of The Screw by Henry James. The basic plot is that a woman is looking after two children in a large mansion, and starts to believe that they may be possessed by two deceased people that had lived with them a year or so previously. I recommend it, but it's in black and white and there are no guns, explosions, car chases, sex scenes, swear words, and no lines of dialogue such as "hot damn, that biatch is smokin' hot!", so it might not be your kind of thing.

The kid reminded me of myself in someways. I really liked the film, and this combined with the fact that my previous avatar was also taken from a 1960s English film made me decide to continue (or create) the trend.

I actually had the picture of him with the the man that may or may not be possessing him standing behind, but decided on just having the kid because I thought that someone might make a comment like that.

The fact that you see a photo of a young boy and your first thought is of sexual ******ation gives an added, twisted dimension to your previous obsession with **** and gay sex.

[abadger]

In my post I made a typo and you didn't even bring it up.

Someone criticises you vocabulary whilst making a spelling mistake in the same sentence, and you don't even mention it? I honestly don't think I would've had a response to that. Oh well...

The kid is from a film called The Innocents, which was based upon the novel The Turn Of The Screw by Henry James. The basic plot is that a woman is looking after two children in a large mansion, and starts to believe that they may be possessed by two deceased people that had lived with them a year or so previously. I recommend it, but it's in black and white and there are no guns, explosions, car chases, sex scenes, swear words, and no lines of dialogue such as "hot damn, that biatch is smokin' hot!", so it might not be your kind of thing.

The kid reminded me of myself in someways. I really liked the film, and this combined with the fact that my previous avatar was also taken from a 1960s English film made me decide to continue (or create) the trend.

I actually had the picture of him and the the man that may or may not be possessing him standing behind, but decided on just having the kid because I thought that someone might make a comment like that.

The fact that you see a photo of a young boy and your first thought is of sexual ******ation gives an added, twisted dimension to your previous obsession with **** and gay sex.

I hesitate to use the word, but this may be the biggest "ownage" I have ever seen on this site. Great work.

[fightnews55]

In my post I made a typo and you didn't even bring it up.

Someone criticises you vocabulary whilst making a spelling mistake in the same sentence, and you don't even mention it? I honestly don't think I would've had a response to that. Oh well...

The kid is from a film called The Innocents, which was based upon the novel The Turn Of The Screw by Henry James. The basic plot is that a woman is looking after two children in a large mansion, and starts to believe that they may be possessed by two deceased people that had lived with them a year or so previously. I recommend it, but it's in black and white and there are no guns, explosions, car chases, sex scenes, swear words, and no lines of dialogue such as "hot damn, that biatch is smokin' hot!", so it might not be your kind of thing.

The kid reminded me of myself in someways. I really liked the film, and this combined with the fact that my previous avatar was also taken from a 1960s English film made me decide to continue (or create) the trend.

I actually had the picture of him with the the man that may or may not be possessing him standing behind, but decided on just having the kid because I thought that someone might make a comment like that.

The fact that you see a photo of a young boy and your first thought is of sexual ******ation gives an added, twisted dimension to your previous obsession with **** and gay sex.

I noticed it but didn't bring it up beacause I'm not a ****head like you and I don't give **** about your grammatical errors. Your a ****in child ******er for christ sakes. What kind of man puts a picture of a boy in his avatar? Put up a chick or a boxer or something you dumb ass. Nobody wants to see your nambla pictures.

[bsrizpac]

Yeah so you can have the excuse when he loses. And then if he manages to win, you'll add more significance to it because he's supposedly shot. Wonder how many would say Calzaghe is "shot" if he loses....considering he's only 2 years younger?

Man you are dim witted paranoid *****. Yeah, I've only said Jones was shot and should retire since the Third Tarver fight.

But now suddenly it's because I don't want to give Joe credit. If you could read, you'd have noticed I've already said that he is a good fighter that will never get enough credit now because there's no one he can fight to prove it anymore.

Jones is shot. Get it through your brain. No one is buying losers like you propping him up to make Joe look good. It's pathetic and shows you guys are biased or know nothing about the sport.