Calzaghes best oponent was ?

[Dynamite Kid]

u guys can say it wasn't b-hop. its all good. the average joe can't see b-hops brilliance. and if his name is calzaghe, he can't see his right hand either....

dude what would of happend to Jermain Taylor if he had been more active against Pavlik in the second fight ? he would of caught with more punches and and ended up getting KTFO again IMO

if Hopkins had threw more leather at Calzaghe he would of lost more convincingly cause he fought to suvrive rather than win thats why he was getting his punches off then holding every 5 minutes trying to con the referee he was trying to steal the fight thats why it looked closer than the Kessler fight cause Kessler fought to win

i think Hatton fought to win againt PBF and paid the price for it where as i thought Zab jacked it in after 5/6 rounds as per usual and fought to survive

[Dynamite Kid]

Eubank was way past his best and was training to fight at Light Heavy. Eubank took the fight at short notice, he had 2 weeks to make Super Middleweight.

u have to factor in Calzaghes lack of experience at that level to

Joe had a perfect style to beat Eubank lots of preassure dont let him work at his own pace and Joe was able to exploit his technical flaws and he was able to absorb Eubanks shots aswell this win gets played down waay to much ive read Eubanks autobiography and he made no excuses what so ever about his preperation he said he got beat fair and square


im not saying he was prime but he still had a lot to offer IMO

[hugh grant]

WHo cares who his best opponent was? WE could spend all day debating it and not come up with an answer. Don t matter who his opponent was, JC found a way to win.

[KESSLER]

Kessler. He is in his prime, and Joe put on a dominating performance.