You see a thread singing the praises of a fighter who did what pretty much everyone expected him to.
Let's not go overboard. David Diaz didn't deserve the title he held, not for being barely able to beat a cadaver named Erik Morales - who had lost pretty convincingly THREE times before facing Diaz; a one-sided loss to Zahir Raheem and two big KO's from Pacquiao. He hasn't fought since.
But now that Pacman has obliterated Diaz like anyone could've guessed, we'll see dozens of threads extolling his greatness.
Don't get me wrong - Manny is either #1 or #2 on the p4p list. But this win means nothing in the big scheme of things, except for those who can now use this to say Pac won x amount of titles in his career. All well and good but this title is a paper one.
Let's not go overboard. David Diaz didn't deserve the title he held, not for being barely able to beat a cadaver named Erik Morales - who had lost pretty convincingly THREE times before facing Diaz; a one-sided loss to Zahir Raheem and two big KO's from Pacquiao. He hasn't fought since.
But now that Pacman has obliterated Diaz like anyone could've guessed, we'll see dozens of threads extolling his greatness.
Don't get me wrong - Manny is either #1 or #2 on the p4p list. But this win means nothing in the big scheme of things, except for those who can now use this to say Pac won x amount of titles in his career. All well and good but this title is a paper one.
Comment