I think people tend to exaggerate on how dirty Hopkins is as a fighter. He does lead with his head at times but a lot of people are making him out to be like Andrew Golota.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Bernard Hopkins a smart fighter?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by abadger View PostHopkins is one of the smartest fighters there is, its how he has been able to box on so long. However, the Trinidad fight isn't the best example, he was simply far too big for Felix.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostActually, that's the perfect example. He outboxed Tito who umm, was the WBA middleweight champ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flawless View PostSize was a factor, but the way Hopkins used this jab in that fight shocked Tito. Tito was completely toyed with in that fight. He even did the Shuffle that how easily he was winning. How many rounds did Tito win that fight? I gave the 1st and 6th . But the 1st was a draw most people called it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flawless View PostSize was a factor, but the way Hopkins used this jab in that fight shocked Tito. Tito was completely toyed with in that fight. He even did the Shuffle that how easily he was winning. How many rounds did Tito win that fight? I gave the 1st and 6th . But the 1st was a draw most people called it.
Size wasn't a factor. Bernard's movement gave Trinidad big ass problems and the jab too. Even when the knockdown came, it was a PERFECT right hand counter. And Trinidad was being punished before that.
I had the fight a shutout, but you could have given round 6 to Trinidad. Not really sure how people scored round 1 for trinidad because both pretty much landed nothing minus that right hand Hopkins landed.
Comment
Comment