Mayweather has the better resume. Beat 2 Top P4P fighters (Hatton, Corrales). 2 wins over Jose Luis Castillo (Although 1 is very controversial), a win over Oscar De La Hoya at 154. And he has good wins at lower weights like Genaro Hernandez, Angel Manfreddy etc.
Calzaghes resume isn't bad, Lacy and Kessler were both undefeated World Champs (And yes I know Lacy wasn't good but anyway..), Hopkins might have been old but Calzaghe was up in weight and fighting a guy still ranked as the best 175 pounder. His wins over Eubank and Reid are both good as well. Along with good wins in his title run like Richie Woodhall and Byron Mitchell.
this is not even close. floyd has 5 p4p fighters on his resume, Joe has 1 and it was a 43 year old hopkins. Floyd is also a 5 division champion while Joe is a 2 division champ but once again, he took over one of the divisions by beating old man hopkins.
this is a laughable thread. UK no name fighters vs Established US/Mexican/PR/Cuban tested talent. hmm I think it's pretty clear that Mayweather has fought WAAAAAYYYYY tougher competition.
Mayweather: DLH, Hatton, Luis Castillo, Corrales, Gatti, Judah, Corley, Jesus Chavez
Calzaghe: Lacy, Kessler, 43 year old Hopkins, two reality tv boxers, and uh... Eubank
The sad thing is I don't even like Mayweather.
Comment